The Washington Post

“High-maintenance” and “highly vocal” judges = racist?

A recent article in the ABA Journal discusses Carl Stewart, the chief judge (as of October 2012) of the Fifth Circuit, the federal appellate court that covers Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Most of the article is an interesting profile of Stewart, but here’s a striking passage:

Many courts have their high-maintenance and highly vocal jurists. The 7th Circuit has Richard Posner. The 9th Circuit has Alex Kozinski. But the 5th Circuit has a plethora of Posners and Kozinskis up and down its ranks.

And as an example of this phenomenon:

When the defendant in a discrimination case opined that President Obama would replace the Statue of Liberty’s torch with “a piece of fried chicken,” a district judge in the 5th Circuit refused to interpret it as a racial slur.

The article goes on to mention other instances where Fifth Circuit judges are difficult: a controversy involving district judge John McBryde (who has been accused of being “intemperate” and “abusive”), and “the simple reality that some 5th Circuit judges do not like each other.”

But let’s focus on this first example, where the district judge refused to interpret the “fried chicken” comment as a racial slur. (You can find that on p. 8 of the appellate opinion in Autry v. Fort Bend Independent School District.) Is that an example of being “high-maintenance” and “highly vocal”? Hard to see how: the district judge was vocal in the sense that he said — in response to the claim that “fried chicken” remark reflected discriminatory animus — “That’s really surprising to Colonel Sanders.” But that doesn’t seem unusually vocal — even if, as the appellate court suggested, it “misse[d] the mark” (perhaps showing a tin ear for recognizing racial comments, if not outright racism). Nor does it show the judge to be high-maintenance, unless that’s the current euphemism the kids are using for being racist.

And in what sense again is this similar to Posner or Kozinski, neither of whom are generally thought of as racist (or for that matter, intemperate, abusive, or uncollegial)?

Sasha Volokh lives in Atlanta with his wife and three kids, and is an associate professor at Emory Law School. He has written numerous articles and commentaries on law and economics, privatization, antitrust, prisons, constitutional law, regulation, torts, and legal history.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
From clubfoot to climbing: Double amputee lives life of adventure
Learn to make traditional soup dumplings
In defense of dads
Play Videos
How to make head cheese
Perks of private flying
The rise and fall of baseball cards
Play Videos
Husband finds love, loss in baseball
New hurdles for a Maryland tradition
How to survive a shark attack
Play Videos
Portland's most important meal of the day
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to save and spend money at college
Next Story
Sasha Volokh · February 14, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.