The Washington Post

On net neutrality, the FCC says it has heard enough from the courts, for now

FCC Chair Tom Wheeler just issued a statement outlining how he plans to respond to the D.C. Circuit’s Verizon v. FCC decision vacating key portions of the FCC’s net neutrality rules. It would be surprising if the Chair had not obtained agreement of the other Commissioners from his party before releasing his statement, so we can pretty safely assume that this is the FCC’s plan going forward.

I don’t find anything surprising in the proposals — they line up with the course of action I suggested here after the ruling: the Commission will not reclassify Internet access service as a common carrier service (though Wheeler pointedly noted that the option remains available); will enforce the transparency rule (which the ruling left in place); will apply a no-blocking rule consistent with what its general counsel at oral argument had said the Commission wanted anyway; will adopt a more flexible standard aimed at discrimination, along the lines of the data roaming regulations the D.C. Circuit approved in Cellco Partnership v. FCC; and will forgo judicial review of Verizon v. FCC.

I just want to emphasize that last decision.  A crucial aspect of Verizon v. FCC was the D.C. Circuit’s holding that the Commission has broad authority under section 706 of the Telecommunications Act.  That ruling was huge for the FCC going forward, so much so that if I were general counsel I wouldn’t want the decision to be reviewed. Wheeler has reached the same conclusion. As I noted here (and Berin Szoka and Geoffrey Manne bemoan here) Verizon may have won a pyrrhic victory.

But of course we’re not done yet. This is the United States, which means there’s much more judicial review to come. What D.C. Circuit said of an environmental law applies to almost every statute: “As night follows day, litigation follows rulemaking.”

Stuart Benjamin is the Douglas B. Maggs Professor of Law, Associate Dean for Research, and co-director of the Center for Innovation Policy at Duke Law School. He specializes in telecommunications law, the First Amendment, and administrative law.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.