Why the Kosovo “precedent” does not justify Russia’s annexation of Crimea

Defenders of Russia’s annexation of Crimea often cite the supposed precedent of Kosovo’s secession from Serbia in 2008. Russian President Vladimir Putin himself recently cited the “well-known Kosovo precedent” as a justification for his regime’s actions in Crimea. He claimed that it was “a very similar situation” to recent events in Crimea. In reality, the two situations could hardly be more different. Attempts to use Kosovo to justify Russia’s actions in Crimea are an unusually blatant exercise in false moral equivalency.

The most glaringly obvious difference between the two cases is that the Kosovo secession occurred in the aftermath of the genocidal mass murder of Kosovar Albanians by the Serbian government in 1998-99. By contrast, there is zero evidence indicating that Crimea’s majority-Russian population was threatened with any remotely comparable atrocities at the hands of the Ukrainian government. Indeed, the most recent genocidal mass murder in modern Crimean history – the mass deportation and partial extermination of the Crimean Tatars – was committed by the Soviet Union, the regime to which Russia is the successor state. Today’s post-Soviet Russian government is not responsible for that atrocity. However, it is worth noting that Vladimir Putin is a former high-ranking officer of the KGB, the Soviet government agency (then known as the NKVD) that played a major role in the Crimean genocide and many other Soviet atrocities, and that Putin is today a leading apologist for the USSR, whose collapse he called “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the twentieth century.” So long as the likes of Putin hold power in the Kremlin, Crimea’s Tatar minority (who are a minority only because the Soviet Union previously exterminated and deported nearly all of them, before allowing some to move back in the 1980s and 90s) have good reason to oppose the return of Russian rule to Crimea.

A second crucial distinction is that the independent government of Kosovo, while far from perfect, adheres to liberal principles and respects human rights at least as much as newly democratized Serbia does. Therefore, Kosovar independence did not lead to any significant oppression that would not have existed otherwise. By contrast, as I discussed in this post, Putin-era Russia, while less oppressive than the USSR, is guilty of numerous human rights violations and is likely to engage in similar practices in Crimea.

Finally, while there is little if any doubt that the vast majority of Kosovo residents supported independence in 2008, the recent Crimean referendum on independence was likely tainted by fraud and intimidation. Polls conducted before Russian military forces occupied the peninsula indicated that only a minority of the population supported reunification with Russia. At the very least, the 97% pro-annexation margin in the official tally for the referendum was utterly implausible. Majority popular support is not necessarily sufficient to justify secession. But to the extent that its presence or absence is morally relevant, it was far more clear in the Kosovo case than in Crimea.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the Russian government vehemently opposed Kosovo’s secession, claiming that it was illegal and unjust. If we take Russia’s position seriously, then secession cannot be justified even in the aftermath of mass murder. By that logic, it is even less defensible in the very different circumstances of Crimea today.

Far from justifying Russian policy in Crimea, the comparison with Kosovo further underscores its indefensible nature.

Ilya Somin is Professor of Law at George Mason University. His research focuses on constitutional law, property law, and popular political participation. He is the author of "The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain" and "Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter."



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read National



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Ilya Somin · March 24, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.