The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Economists’ and law professors’ letter against Tesla ban

Placeholder while article actions load

Over 70 economists and law professors have signed a letter by Dan Crane (from University of Michigan) opposing New Jersey’s ban on direct sales of automobiles. Here’s the letter — I didn’t sign it, but only because I didn’t hear about it until this morning, when the letter had already gone out. Here are some quotes from the letter:

The Motor Vehicle Commission’s regulation was aimed specifically at stopping one company, Tesla Motors, from directly distributing its electric cars. But the regulation would apply equally to any other innovative manufacturer trying to bring a new automobile to market, as well. There is no justification on any rational economic or public policy grounds for such a restraint of commerce. Rather, the upshot of the regulation is to reduce competition in New Jersey’s automobile market for the benefit of its auto dealers and to the detriment of its consumers. It is protectionism for auto dealers, pure and simple.
. . .
In sum, we have not heard a single argument for a direct distribution ban that makes any sense. To the contrary, these arguments simply bolster our belief that the regulations in question are motivated by economic protectionism that favors dealers at the expense of consumers and innovative technologies. It is discouraging to see this ban being used to block a company that is bringing dynamic and environmentally friendly products to market. We strongly encourage you to repeal it, by new legislation if necessary.

(Via the International Center for Law and Economics, and the Truth on the Market blog.)