The Washington Post

The greatness of Justice Hugo Black

Last week I nominated Justice Hugo Black as an “all time great” justice on account of his “historical significance and legal ability.” Co-blogger David Bernstein has questioned Black’s greatness a couple of times, so I thought I’d offer a brief explanation.

— Incorporation. Hugo Black was probably the biggest voice for the incorporation of the Bill of Rights on the 20th Century Supreme Court, as you can see in his fight with Frankfurter in the opinions in Adamson v. California.

Yes, he lost a lot of battles: he was in dissent in Adamson, and the Court eventually adopted the “selective” incorporation of the Bill of Rights rather than the categorical incorporation that Black supported. But Black won the war. Nearly every provision of the Bill of Rights has been incorporated anyway, and in McDonald v. City of Chicago the Court acknowledged that its theory of nominally selective incorporation has moved closer and closer to Black’s.

— The First Amendment. Black is famous (or famously mocked) for saying that “make no law” means “no law.” Of course that’s an oversimplification, but it also conveys an important attitude. And Black knew it was an oversimplication; remember that he was in the dissent in Tinker v. Des Moines.

Overall, Black’s First Amendment theory seems to have been categorical protection with categorical exceptions, and no case-by-case balancing of the reasonableness of restrictions. That pretty closely tracks a lot of modern First Amendment doctrine, and as I discussed in my “historical tests” post, we are the better for it.

— As a proto-originalist/textualist, Black also rejected a number of doctrines that it would have been easy and politically palatable for him to accept — like substantive due process. As with incorporation, you could say that this shows his lack of influence, because he lost those cases. But also as with incorporation, the broader doctrinal trend seems closer to Black’s view than the reverse.

— The areas that made him famous should be enough to qualify him (he should qualify on incorporation alone), but they only scratch the surface. He wrote Gideon v. Wainwright, Conley v. Gibson, Testa v. Katt, Younger v. Harris, Chapman v. California, Youngstown, Marsh v. Alabama, Hughes v. Fetter, Ashe v. Swenson, Burford v. Sun Oil, Griffin v. Prince Edward County, Palmer v. Thompson, and probably dozens of other opinions that are taught every year in law school.

— Of course, he had feet of clay. As a young lawyer, he was a member of the Klan, and as a Justice he wrote the majority opinion in Korematsu. But neither of those things eliminates his overall importance or ability as a Justice.

Will Baude is an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School, where he teaches constitutional law and federal courts. His recent articles include Rethinking the Federal Eminent Domain Power, (Yale Law Journal, 2013), and Beyond DOMA: State Choice of Law in Federal Statutes, (Stanford Law Review, 2012).



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
This isn't your daddy's gun club
A look inside the world of Candomblé
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
The rise and fall of baseball cards
Is fencing the answer to brain health?
Play Videos
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
How to prevent 'e-barrassment'
The art of tortilla-making
Play Videos
Circus nuns: These sisters are no act
How hackers can control your car from miles away
How the new credit card chip makes purchases more secure
Next Story
Orin Kerr · April 16, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.