• Opinion

Minnesota bans people from wearing "[i]ssue oriented material designed to influence or impact voting" (such as "'Please I.D. Me' buttons") and "[m]aterial promoting a group with recognizable political views (such as the Tea Party, MoveOn.org, and so on)"; the Supreme Court will consider whether that's constitutional.

  • Opinion

Compelled speech about availability of abortion, retaliatory arrests and ideological messages on voter clothing in polling places.

  • Opinion

So holds a 2-to-1 panel decision of the 7th Circuit.

  • Opinion

The decision arises out of Prestigious Pets' lawsuit against two customers who posted negative reviews.

  • Opinion

An amicus brief in the Supreme Court argues that a baker's expansive claims would "punch a hole through the center of the Nation's anti-discrimination laws"

  • Opinion

So the 9th Circuit held Friday.

  • Opinion

But the First Amendment would prevent Congress from ordering people to stand for the national anthem (and, read properly, the statute likely doesn't purport to issue any such command).

  • Opinion

"The FCC, under my leadership, will stand for the First Amendment."

  • Opinion

The letter raises the same First Amendment problems as does President Trump's tweet urging changing the NFL's tax treatment because of player protests.

  • Opinion

But such retaliation based on players' expression would violate the First Amendment.

Load More