The Washington Post

Why the moon landing couldn’t have been faked

We probably don't have many (any?) readers who think the moon landing was faked. But this clip below is still pretty fascinating.

Photographer and filmmaker S.G. Collins offers up his own elegant explanation for why the video clips of the Apollo moon missions couldn't have been a hoax. Back in 1969, we simply didn't have the video technology necessary to fake what people saw:

Collins picks apart some of the crudest moon-hoax conspiracy theories, but the interesting stuff starts around 4:30, when he takes us through the history of video techniques such as slow-motion. There was no way to simulate the moon in a studio back then. "Why are people missing this?" he asks. "I think they're forgetting how primitive video was in 1969."

(Via the always-interesting Jason Kottke.)

Show Comments
Most Read
DJIA -1.29%
NASDAQ -3.25%
Last Update: 4:33 PM 02/06/2016(DJIA&NASDAQ)



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.