The Washington Post

READ: The Supreme Court rules against proof-of-citizenship requirements for voting

In Arizona et al. v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., et al., the court ruled that the federal National Voter Registration Act of 1993 — or the "motor voter" act — trumps an Arizona law that "requires voter-registration officials to 'reject' any application for registration, including a Federal Form, that is not accompanied by documentary evidence of citizenship."

While they note that Arizona has a right to decide who votes in state elections there, they are able to request changes to the federal registration form, and then challenge the federal government if it fails to incorporate those changes. The court does not rule on the merits of such a lawsuit by Arizona.

Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion, joined by John Roberts, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. Anthony Kennedy joined in part, and wrote a concurrence. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito each wrote dissents.

Show Comments
Most Read
DJIA -1.29%
NASDAQ -3.25%
Last Update: 02/08/2016(DJIA&NASDAQ)



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.