The Washington Post

The green movement has a Millennial problem

America’s Millennials are less likely than older generations to identify with the environmental movement, according to a new Pew Research Center report out Friday. The word "environmentalist" typically conjures up images of earnest young idealists gathering petition signatures and chaining themselves to old-growth trees. But today’s study finds that older Americans are more likely to call themselves environmentalists than younger ones.

Millennial generation least likely to call themselves environmentalists

Forty-four percent of the Silent Generation – those born between 1928 and 1945 – say the word "environmentalist" describes them very well, compared to 42 percent of Boomers and Gen-Xers, and only 32 percent of Millennials. This is partly because younger adults simply don’t like labels – back in the late '90s the Gen-Xers were the cohort least likely to identify as environmentalists. But four-in-ten of them embraced this description then, compared to the third of Millennials who do so now.

More significantly, Millennials are willing to self-identify with other issues, particularly gay rights. Fifty-one percent of Millennials describe themselves as supporters of gay rights, versus only 37 percent of Gen Xers, 33 percent of Boomers, and 32 percent of the Silent Generation. This suggests that gay rights is more of a salient, self-defining issue for Millennials than protecting the environment.

This isn’t to say that they don’t care about the environment. For instance, a 2011 Pew survey found that compared to other generations, Millennials were more supportive of stricter environmental laws, more likely to attribute global warming to human activity, and more likely to favor environmentally-friendly policies like green energy development and tax incentives for hybrid vehicles.

Taken together, the two Pew surveys indicate that while Millennials are generally supportive of policies protecting the environment, they don’t identify strongly with environmentalism as a whole. This may portend future trouble for a movement that relies heavily on highly-motivated volunteers to donate time and money in support of its cause.

Christopher Ingraham writes about politics, drug policy and all things data. He previously worked at the Brookings Institution and the Pew Research Center.
Comments
Show Comments
Most Read
DJIA -1.29%
NASDAQ -3.25%
Last Update: 02/07/2016(DJIA&NASDAQ)

business

wonkblog

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.