The Washington Post

Believe it or not, Congress gets more done in election years

Congress rolled back into town this week after their Easter break, dead-set on "doing the bare minimum" for the remainder of the term, according to this delightfully deadpan AP story. But from a standpoint of legislative productivity — measured by days in session, or bills passed — what exactly does the bare minimum look like? Read on to find out.

The assumption has always been that Congress does less during election years, primarily for two reasons:

A) that they're spending their time campaigning at home, rather than legislating in Washington; B) that they're hesitant to take any political stances that could be used against them in an election year fight.

Congress keeps detailed records its time in session via the Résumé of Congressional Activity, and there are, in fact, measurable and significant differences in the amount of time Congress spends in session in election vs. non-election years.  In off-years when there is no election (last year being the most recent example), the Senate spends an average of 165 days in session, compared to 156 days for the House.

But in congressional election years, like this one, that number falls to 159 for the Senate and 139 for the House. And during presidential election years like 2012, the drop is even steeper: 142 days in session for the Senate and 129 for the House.

congress days in session

So does it follow from this that Congress is actually getting less work done? Not exactly. Congressmen do tend to introduce fewer bills during election years — the volume of bills introduced drops by nearly 50 percent in both House and Senate for election vs. non-election years. But believe it or not, the volume of bills passed during election years nearly doubles, in both House and Senate.


More interestingly, this isn't a statistical fluke — in every single two-year congressional term since 1947, more bills have been passed in the second year of the term than in the first. This is readily apparent when you look at the trend lines below — the jagged peaks and valleys mark the alternation between off- and election years.

bills trend

Partially, this reflects the structure of the two-year congressional term: Congressmen introduce bills during the first year of the term, which always falls on an off-year, and then pass those bills — or at least a very small portion of them — during the second year.

Moreover, "bills passed" is a blunt instrument for measuring congressional productivity. It doesn't distinguish between, say, a bill to rename a post office and the Affordable Care Act. It is also important to note that the overall trend of bills passed is down sharply from 50 years ago, while time in session has held generally constant.

But this should dispel the notion that Congress sits on its hands during election years. If anything, the compressed schedule, with fewer days in session combined with the looming deadline of the end of term and uncertainty thereafter, seem to spur Congress to action.

Christopher Ingraham writes about politics, drug policy and all things data. He previously worked at the Brookings Institution and the Pew Research Center.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Puneet Kollipara · May 1, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.