Birth rates in the U.S. remained fairly stable from the eighties to the early aughts, she said, but began to dip by 2008—especially among women entering their prime childbearing years. By 2012, millennials reproduced at a pace that would lead to 948 births per 1,000 women—“by far the slowest pace of any generation,” the report said.
All races experienced a birth decline. Hispanics saw the largest: From 2007 or 2012, the rate dropped 26 percent (1,570 to 1,158). The rate for African American women fell 14 percent in the same five year period (1,216 to 1,046) and 11 percent for white women (976 to 866).
So, it’s not surprising millennials put baby dreams on hold. There’s precedent: “Previous historical low points for twenty-something fertility rates occurred in the early 1930s and late 1970s,” the Urban Institute paper noted, “and coincided with other times of economic stress.”
For some, no ring means no babies. The lack of marital commitment drove a disproportionate fertility dip among young white woman, the researchers found:
It’s too early to tell if millennials will have fewer children than generations past. Women born between 1980 and 2000 might catch up on childbearing in their thirties, Astone said.
One thing to watch, though, is how current birth trends may affect income inequality down the line. Among baby boomers and Gen Xers, trends in marriage and childbearing seemed to deepen differences between low and higher-income families.
“Family inequality increased as single parenthood increased among already disadvantaged groups… while more advantaged young adults postponed both childbearing and marriage,” researchers wrote. “Millennial fertility might be a continuation of the trend in family divergence, or it might start a return to earlier patterns of family formation.”