UnitedHealth plans to withdraw from health insurance marketplaces in Arkansas, Michigan, Connecticut and parts of Georgia. The decision is a sequel to an announcement by executives late last year that the insurer had suffered financial losses and might leave the health exchanges altogether in 2017. UnitedHealth reported that it expects to lose $650 million in the exchanges in 2016.
Prior to the call, the Obama Administration attempted to downplay any departures from UnitedHealth.
"We have full confidence, based on data, that the Marketplaces will continue to thrive for years ahead. The number of issuers per state has grown year-over-year," Health and Human Services spokesman Ben Wakana said in a statement released Monday morning. "The Marketplace should be judged by the choices it offers consumers, not the decisions of any one issuer."
Although UnitedHealth is the nation's biggest health insurer, it was slow to enter the exchanges in 2014, rolling out plans in just four states initially. In the call, executives said they cover 795,000 people through the exchanges and expect that number to drop to 650,000 by December. There are 12.7 million people insured through the state and federal marketplaces, according to the latest data.
Several observers said that while the decision is a clear signal of the troubles insurers face in making money in the marketplaces, it doesn't mean that other companies will follow suit.
"This is an industry problem. A lot of them [insurers] are losing money in a number of states," said Ana Gupte, a senior analyst in healthcare services at Leerink Partners.
However, she added, "I think United will probably be the most bold, in terms of the exits," partially because only a small portion of the company's revenue comes from the marketplaces relative to other insurers, such as Aetna or Anthem, which would find it more difficult to walk away.
The true impact of UnitedHealth's departure will vary by location, according to a new report by the Kaiser Family Foundation. That analysis found that, if United were to drop out of all the states, 1.1 million people in the exchanges would have just one option for an insurer, provided no other insurers rushed in to fill the gap.
State-by-state, the impact could be significant in some rural areas and Southern states, the Kaiser analysis found. But the report also showed that, overall, the effects would be relatively modest. Even if United exited all states, most marketplace enrollees would still have the ability to choose between three or more insurers. An average health plan used as a benchmark would be about 1 percent more expensive if United had not participated in 2016.
"I don’t know what a 'handful' means, but it does sound like a pretty big pullout. But since we don’t know which markets it is -- we know some of them but we don’t know many of the others -- we don’t know how big a deal it is in terms of competition," said Gary Claxton, a vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.
United's announcement comes as other insurers have indicated concern over how they are faring in the marketplaces created by health reform, as well. Last month, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association released a report indicating that new members who enrolled in individual plans used more medical services of all kinds and accounted for health care spending 22 percent higher than people with employer-based insurance in 2015.
At Aetna's earnings call for the fourth quarter of 2015, chief executive Mark Bertolini said the insurer was concerned about the marketplaces.
"This business remained unprofitable in 2015 and we continue to have serious concerns about the sustainability of the public exchanges," Bertolini said.
Katherine Hempstead of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said UnitedHealth's move was significant, but far from a death knell for the marketplaces. She took note of the fact that instead of leaving Georgia altogether, UnitedHealth is going to continue to participate, offering insurance through a subsidiary called Harken Health.
"I don’t think the exit of this carrier is, in and of itself, a threat to the overall market. It’s a message," Hempstead said. "To me, it’s a sign of a process of evolution, where the sellers really have to change what they do to make money in this market -- and they’re starting to."