In 2002, one investigator took this idea even further. Paul Griffin, an “archaeoastronomer” from Ireland, considered the stone carvings and the age of the site against calculations of when solar eclipses may have been visible from the area. Those calculations suggested that a near-total eclipse occurred at the site around 3340 B.C., around the time it was built.
One of the Loughcrew cairns also contains a large stone carving of overlapping concentric circles, which could represent a view of the moon partially occluding the sun during an eclipse.
In Griffin’s telling, the larger concentric circle to the left represents the moon, while the partially occluded circle immediately adjacent represents the sun. Those circles do indeed bear a striking resemblance to a partial solar eclipse, like the one below.
Other circles surrounding the pair may represent stars suddenly visible in the sky during the near-total eclipse, while the diamonds to the right could refer to stone pillars elsewhere at the site.
According to Griffin’s calculations, this eclipse would have happened around sunset on a day in the late autumn, or Nov. 30, 3340 B.C. in Universal Time.
Previous archaeologists working at the site had discovered charred human remains from nearly 50 individuals placed beneath a basin immediately in front of the carving, suggesting a monument of great ritual importance — “a possible human sacrifice to ‘save’ the Neolithic 'sky God' (Sun) from dying as it descended to the ‘underworld’ at the horizon, with 15 percent of its surface still ‘eaten away,’ ” Griffin speculates.
Is Griffin’s interpretation correct? It’s impossible to know for sure. The people who created the carvings didn’t leave behind any writings to explain their purpose to curious onlookers 5,000 years in the future.
But Griffin’s explanations were convincing enough for NASA to include his ideas in their roundup of eclipse history. Lunar scientist John Dvorak also included them in his recent book on eclipses, “Mask of the Sun,” although he notes that the meaning of the carvings is “open to debate” and that “no one knows for sure exactly what the concentric circles represent.”
Other experts on astronomy and ancient culture are more skeptical of the Loughcrew eclipse hypothesis. Anthony Aveni, a professor of astronomy and anthropology at Colgate University and author of the book “In the Shadow of the Moon,” said in an email that he sees “no reason to tie [the Loughcrew carvings] in any way to eclipses. In my view you need a written record to imply with any certainty that eclipses are being referenced.
“There’s no evidence I know of to suggest that neolithic people anywhere kept track of eclipse cycles,” he added.
These disagreements are bound to arise when you peer back 5,000 years — there’s little certainty when it comes to the motives and ideas of a culture that far removed from our own, particularly one that had not adopted any sort of written language.
But that mystery is, of course, part of the draw — both of ancient cultures, and of the solar eclipses that we know they would have seen, regardless of whether they commemorated them with carvings or inscriptions.