I wrote a CNN column today saying debate would be a referendum on Obama foreign policy. It was. Apparently both of them like it.
— David Rothkopf (@djrothkopf) October 23, 2012
This debate threatens to restore us to a bipartisan foreign policy.
— peacefare.net (@DanielSerwer) October 23, 2012
My take: Romney makes himself out a peacemonger, but moots all his differences with Obama. So why change presidents? http://t.co/A1PCa8Ac
— Michael Hirsh (@michaelphirsh) October 23, 2012
In conclusion, this failed president has made us weaker in the world, and I will continue all his policies. #butmoreleadery
— Michael Grunwald (@MikeGrunwald) October 23, 2012
Romney tried to present as a plausible commander in chief tonight by mimicking the current one. I suspect voters will prefer the real thing.
— Martin Indyk (@Martin_Indyk) October 23, 2012