Hu's warning about official corruption and its threat to the Communist Party's rule has long been repeated by scholars and experts both inside and outside China. Corruption, they say, weakens public trust in the government, erodes that government's ability to behave responsibly, and saps an economy that is already slowing.
That's the macro view. For the micro view, consider Beijing's professional poker loser. As Jamil Anderlini reports in the Financial Times, his job is to use poker as a cover for bribing government officials on behalf of a real estate developer. The best part of this phenomenon is that the developer started outsourcing his bribery to the poker player not to evade police, but because bribing the officials himself was getting too time-consuming. And, with all the drinking usually involved, it was bad for his health.
In fact, things had become so bad for the property developer that he had come up with an ingenious way to outsource his bribery. He now organizes private high-stakes poker games with well-connected officials but hires a professional player to represent him. He allows the officials to play on credit, shows up to drink a few toasts and play a few rounds, tells his representative poker pro who to lose big to and then goes home to bed in the interests of preserving his liver and his sanity.
Real estate is famously important for China's economy – much of the nation's economic growth has come from building highrises to accommodate the hundreds of millions of rural Chinese moving into the big cities. Real estate is also notoriously corrupt. Developers can make enormous sums of money, and Communist Party officials are often the gatekeepers to their fortunes: they control permits, approve or reject projects, and can help "relocate" families whose homes might sit on valuable land.
With so much money at stake, perhaps it's not surprising that corruption is as routine as this story suggests. Still, when government officials are answering to the highest-paying developers rather than to the public will – or to the party bosses concerned with maintaining sustainable economic growth – their decisions on how to guide China's all-important real estate sector might not necessarily be the most beneficial for their country.