The Washington Post

Can Twitter censor the Israel Defense Forces?

Israel's Iron Dome defense system fires to intercept incoming missiles from Gaza in the port town of Ashdod. (AP Photo /Tsafrir Abayov)

Israel made history Wednesday when it began live-tweeting its own strike on the Gaza Strip. Now that the initial shock is over, the questions are setting in: Are governments allowed to use Twitter that way? And even if they can, should they?

A rumor widely circulated Thursday morning claimed that the Israel Defense Forces' Twitter account, @IDFSpokesperson, went down for a 40-minute period, but neither Twitter nor the reporter who first broke the story, Daily Dot’s Kris Holt, have definitively confirmed that the account was suspended. A parody account, @IDFspokesman, was definitely taken down.  

Reports have also claimed that Youtube is suspending videos from the IDF’s official channel, but one video that was "removed mistakenly" was reinstated by the site within hours, according to All Things Digital.

Users have seized on phrasing in both Facebook and Youtube’s terms of service as reasons for the alleged suspensions. Twitter does not allow users to post “direct, specific threats of violence against others,” and Youtube bans both threats and “graphic or gratuitous violence.” @IDFSpokesperson famously (or infamously) sent a tweet Wednesday warning Hamas leaders to hide, and its Youtube channel includes footage of Israeli attacks in the Gaza Strip.

The big irony here is that for all of the power of militaries like the IDF, and for all the savvy of their social media campaigns, governments still must abide by the same terms of service as ordinary users. It’s humbling that military communications have to adhere to the same rules meant for regular civilian users, and it's a reminder of the nastiness of war that so much war-related social media potentially bumps up against terms of service. It also represents a fascinating, social-media-age inversion between the censor and the censored; governments and militaries, the bodies that usually police speech, are now at risk of being constrained, themselves.

Caitlin Dewey is The Post’s digital culture critic. Follow her on Twitter @caitlindewey or subscribe to her daily newsletter on all things Internet. (tinyletter.com/cdewey)

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read

world

worldviews

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing
More from The Post