We've been under a State of Emergency in #Egypt for decades. Nothing new here, to be honest.
— Nadia El-Awady (@NadiaE) August 14, 2013
Prior to that, from 1967 (when Egypt and other Arab states lost the "Six-Day War" against Israel) until 2012, Egypt's broad "emergency law" gave the president and police sweeping powers to arrest "perceived threats to the country's stability," including anti-government protesters and opposition parties. While the law was theoretically intended only for times of crisis, Hosni Mubarak activated it for almost a 20-year period -- from 1981 to 2012 -- when he was president. Here's the Post's Ernesto Londono explaining it in 2011:
Critics say that through it all, the real aim has been control. In a country ostensibly heading toward open elections, it is a vital issue. Under the emergency rules, political gatherings of more than a handful of people can be held only with the state's permission, and the government has allowed few new parties to organize or opposition groups to gather ...When activated, the law allows security forces to detain people without warrants, circumvents traditional criminal courts to keep suspects detained for years, permits interceptions of communication and restricts gatherings such as protests.
That made the law a lightning rod in Egypt's 2011 revolution, and its expiration in 2012 was hailed as a victory by human rights groups and the U.S. State Department.
Of course, we don't know how similar this new state of emergency will be to the old emergency law, and ultimately, a "state of emergency" in Egypt means what the government wants it to. It does not, however, bode well for the Muslim Brotherhood. They have historically been the group that suffered most under the emergency law.

