The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

A huge leaked list of Islamic State fighters sounds too good to be true. Is it?

Smoke billows during clashes between Islamic State militants and Iraqi security forces in Sadiyah, 60 miles north of Baghdad, in November 2014. (AP)

It almost sounds too good to be true: a huge list of Islamic State fighters, leaked from inside the organization's own internal security division, potentially representing a treasure trove of detailed information on the group to be picked apart by intelligence agencies.

On Wednesday, Sky News revealed that it had acquired this list, reportedly registration documents for Islamic State fighters from 2013. There were tens of thousands of names on the list from at least 51 countries, the British news organization reported, making it perhaps the most important Islamic State leak since the Sinjar records of al-Qaeda in Iraq — documents discovered by U.S. forces in Iraq that contained the details of more than 600 fighters from that group, a precursor to the Islamic State.

Sky News reported that the documents were contained on a memory stick that was stolen from the head of the Islamic State's internal security police. Though it was the first Western outlet to publish details of the list, it appears that an opposition Syrian outlet, Zaman al-Wasl, was able to publish details of the list first, shortly before Sky News published its story. German authorities are also believed to have a list that is either similar or the same, according to reports in the German press from earlier this week.

Leaked documents may reveal the inner workings of the Islamic State — but what if they are fake?

The scale and detail of the information certainly seems dramatic. In registration questionnaires, foreign fighters were asked to provide not only their own details, but also information about who had smuggled them into Islamic State-held territory and their links back home. They were even asked whether they would prefer to fight or die in a suicide bombing.

Richard Barrett, former global terrorism operations director at MI6, told Sky News that the list was "an absolute goldmine of information of enormous significance and interest to very many people, particularly the security and intelligence services."

U.S. officials said that they are aware of the reported cache but have reached no conclusions about the authenticity of the documents. The CIA declined to comment. One U.S. official, however, did say that the records would be "fantastic if true."

Whether they actually are true remains to be seen. A number of stylistic details from the list have stood out as inconsistent to experts, including the fact that the Arabic version of the group's previous name, "The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria," is written two different ways, a previously unseen circular logo appears on the documents, and the column used to refer to the death of the fighter did not use the jihadist term for "martyrdom," as seen widely in other Islamic State documents.

The Islamic State’s latest shock tactic: Showing children on suicide missions

Additionally, while Sky News suggests that there are tens of thousands of names on the list, Zaman al-Wasl reports that its own list features 22,000 entries. But, due to repetitions, only 1,700 people are actually identified.

Charlie Winter, a terrorism analyst currently at Georgia State University, told Agence France-Presse that these unusual details gave him reason to pause. "There would be big alarm bells for me, because when I've seen inconsistencies like that in the past, they've been on really shoddily made forgeries," Winter said. Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi, another analyst who has written guides to recognizing faked Islamic State documents, said he remains unconvinced that the documents are "wholly authentic," noting that a financial motivation could have led to the documents being faked or authentic data being tampered with somehow.

Others have suggested that the documents' obvious flaws suggested they were indeed the work of an overworked bureaucracy, rather than a forger. "If these are forgeries, why aren't they more artfully done?" William McCants, director of the Brookings Institution's Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World, said in an email. Peter Neumann, a jihadism researcher with King's College London, suggested on Twitter that faking this many documents was simply unrealistic.

Rita Katz, co-founder of the Search for International Terrorist Entities Intelligence Group, said that a number of details can be cross-referenced with other reports, suggesting that the information contained in the documents is real. While she acknowledged the stylistic oddities within the documents, she suggested that this is indicative of their bureaucratic rather than theological or propagandistic function.

"ISIS, just like al-Qaeda, is a very detail-oriented organization," Katz explained, using an acronym to describe the Islamic State. "These forms are for administrative purposes – and while some indicate that the use of the word 'killed' is not appropriate and might hint that the docs are fake, ISIS often uses the word killed instead of martyred."

Read more:

Osama bin Laden warned against almost every aspect of Islamic State playbook

Islamic State is no longer so formidable on the battlefield

The current chaos in Syria may help the Islamic State