Dutch public prosecution service spokesman Vincent Veenman told Reuters that preliminary tests showed the cause of death was “drinking a liquid that can kill.”
“We cannot yet say what that substance was; further testing is needed,” he said, according to Reuters.
It was a defiant final act for the 72-year-old accused of ethnic cleansing two decades ago in a failed attempt to create a Bosnian Croat ministate, according to the Associated Press.
The appeal of Praljak was one of the final matters for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Praljak was accused of using violence and murder to drive out Muslims.
Praljak “facilitated the murder of Muslims who did not belong to any armed force, and the destruction of property in Stupni Do in October 1993,” according to the United Nations.
He was indicted in March 2004 and pleaded not guilty a month later. But on May 29, 2013, he was found guilty of all charges.
The appeal was the only thing standing between Praljak and possibly spending the rest of his life in prison. The tribunal is expected to conclude next month.
For now, it is suspended as questions swirl around Praljak’s actions, including what he swallowed and how he was able to sneak it into a war tribunal.
On Thursday, prosecutor Marilyn Fikenscher told AP that investigators are still trying to determine how Praljak got the container into the courtroom.
Toma Fila, a Serbian lawyer, told AP that security “is just like at an airport” when it comes to metal objects, but that security officials would not be analyzing “pills and small quantities of liquids.”
Fikenscher said the container Praljak drank from held a lethal chemical, but declined to provide further details. She said authorities are still awaiting an autopsy, including toxicology tests.
Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic told Reuters he regretted Praljak’s death.
“His act, which we regrettably saw today, mostly speaks about a deep moral injustice toward six Croats from Bosnia and the Croatian people . . . We voice dissatisfaction and regret about the verdict,” Plenkovic said.
Plenkovic said Thursday that Praljak was “obviously shaken by the possibility he would be convicted” and that he wanted to make a statement that the court was wrong to convict him, according to AP.
Prosecutors said he helped destroy the iconic 16th-century bridge in the Bosnian city of Mostar in November 1993, according to Newsweek. He also facilitated and concealed his armed forces’ killing of Muslim civilians, including victims of the Stupni Do massacre.
According to The Washington Post’s David Ottaway, more than three dozen civilians in the Bosnian mountain village of Stupni Do were killed “by Bosnian Croat militiamen from the nearby town of Vareš, allegedly seeking revenge for the loss of another hamlet to Muslim forces.”
Rolf Weckesser, an international peacekeeping monitor who got to the village days after the attack, “found a scene of complete destruction,” according to the tribunal's findings, “with the houses still smouldering and about 20 bodies burnt beyond recognition, some of them the bodies of children. There were no indications of fighting.”
U.N. forces that arrived shortly afterward were disgusted by the Croat soldiers’ actions.
“Those who did this are not soldiers, they are scum,” Brig. Angus Ramsay, the chief of staff of the U.N. Protection Force in Bosnia, told Ottaway and other reporters. “This is not war. This is a war crime. Those who have done this thing will one day answer for it.”
Praljak had maintained that Croatian forces had no role in the Bosnian wars and rejected prosecutors’ arguments that he had been involved in the destruction of the bridge at Mostar and the Stupni Do massacre.
The tribunal disagreed, finding Praljak and others culpable.
The tribunal, which last week convicted former Bosnian Serb military chief Gen. Ratko Mladic of genocide and other crimes, was set up in 1993, while fighting still raged in the former Yugoslavia. It indicted 161 suspects and convicted 90 of them.
The appeals judges upheld a key finding that late Croat President Franjo Tudjman was a member of a plan to create a Croat ministate in Bosnia.
A decade’s worth of hearings was a reminder of the complex web of ethnic tensions that fueled fighting in Bosnia, AP reported. Those tensions continue to create friction today.
The tribunal overturned some of the convictions related to him. But the heaviest ones remained, along with the 20-year sentence — and the shame of being branded a war criminal.
This post has been updated.