The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Opinion Fiona Hill shows how Trump and Republicans function as Putin’s useful idiots

Former National Security Council Russia adviser Fiona Hill testified on the fifth day of impeachment hearings against President Trump on Nov. 21. (Video: The Washington Post, Photo: Bonni Jo Mount/The Washington Post)

When former White House national security aide Fiona Hill and diplomat David Holmes testified Thursday morning, they might not have made Donald Trump’s impeachment and conviction more likely, in the sense of providing new evidence of crimes and misdemeanors the president committed.

What they did do, however, was demonstrate that Trump and portions of the Republican Party have become what in the Cold War we used to call “useful idiots,” people who had become tools of the Kremlin not because they were devoted to the Soviet cause but because they were too stupid to realize how they were being manipulated.

The latest updates in the Trump impeachment hearings

In her opening statement, Hill put her finger on the problem:

Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves.

Later, Hill was asked by the Democrats’ counsel, “Isn’t it also true that some of President Trump’s most senior advisers had informed him that this theory of Ukraine interference in the 2016 election was false?”

“That’s correct,” she replied. Instead, Trump chose to listen not to intelligence and national security officials but to his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who was obsessed with the idea that it was not Russia but Ukraine that interfered in the 2016 election.

Soviet show trials often ended in execution. This impeachment process is not that, says Global Opinions editor Christian Caryl. (Video: The Washington Post)

As this conspiracy theory has it, Ukraine, not Russia, hacked Democratic emails and set up Russia to take the fall for sabotaging the election, and a cybersecurity company called CrowdStrike helped cover it up. Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to help him make this true by finding an allegedly missing server in Ukraine.

This theory is not just bonkers, it is designed to serve the interests of the Kremlin. Holmes explained what Russia gains from the spread of the theory:

First of all, to deflect from the allegations of Russian interference. Second of all, to drive a wedge between the United States and Ukraine, which Russia wants to essentially get back into its sphere of influence. Thirdly, to besmirch Ukraine and its political leadership, to degrade and erode support for Ukraine from other key partners in Europe and elsewhere.

Indeed, just this week, at an economic forum in Moscow, Vladimir Putin celebrated the continued repetition of the Ukraine interference theory. “Thank God,” he said, “no one is accusing us of interfering in the U.S. elections anymore; now they’re accusing Ukraine.”

To be clear, Republicans are not spreading this theory because they want to serve Putin. They’re doing it because they want to serve Trump, who plainly believes that any discussion of Russian interference serves to delegitimize his election. As Hill said, Russian and Republican efforts to blame Ukraine for 2016 interference may have developed independently, but “those two things have, over time, started to fuse together.”

But as Hill testified, Russia wasn’t just trying to help Trump, it was attacking the entire system of democracy by delegitimizing the presidency:

The goal of the Russians was really to put whoever became the president, by trying to tip their hands on one side of the scale, under a cloud. So if secretary, former first lady, former senator Clinton had been elected as president, as indeed many expected in the run-up to the election in 2016, she too would have had major questions about her legitimacy. And I think that what we’re seeing here as a result of all these narratives, this is exactly what the Russian government was hoping for.

Furthermore, the effort to deflect attention away from Russia and on to Ukraine has the effect of making Russia’s almost inevitable effort to meddle in the 2020 election more likely to succeed. When it happens — and it will happen — how are Republicans going to react? It’s all a hoax, they’ll say. Just a Democratic attempt to delegitimize Trump, the way they did before. Nothing to see here, move along.

And Putin will marvel yet again at how easy it is to manipulate the useful idiots in the GOP into doing exactly what he wants.

Read more:

Follow Paul Waldman's opinionsFollow

Greg Sargent: The GOP defense of Trump is in slow-motion collapse. It’s about to get worse.

For more coverage, sign up to receive Dana Milbank’s Impeachment Diary by email

Henry Olsen: Republicans won’t impeach Trump. But they should punish him.

Kathleen Parker: It looks like Republicans are trying to impeach the media — not Trump

Ruth Marcus: The House is now fully entitled to hear from Pence, Pompeo, Mulvaney and Giuliani

The latest commentary on the Trump impeachment

Looking for more Trump impeachment coverage following the president’s acquittal?

See Dana Milbank’s Impeachment Diary: Find all the entries in our columnist’s feature.

Get the latest: See complete Opinions coverage from columnists, editorial cartoonists and the Editorial Board.

Read the most recent take from the Editorial Board: It’s not over. Congress must continue to hold Trump accountable.

The House impeachment managers weigh in in an op-ed: Trump won’t be vindicated. The Senate won’t be, either.

Stay informed: Read the latest reporting and analysis on impeachment from the Post newsroom.

Want even more? Sign up for the Opinions A.M. and P.M. newsletters, delivered to your inbox six days a week.