Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, has belatedly withdrawn the extradition legislation that prompted the initial protests. But her boss, Chinese President Xi Jinping, reportedly has taken a hard line against conceding to the protesters’ more substantive demands, including free elections for the territory’s government — something that Beijing promised when it took over the former British colony in 1997. Instead, the regime is accusing the mostly peaceful demonstrators of employing “terrorism” and has threatened a massive crackdown, either by Hong Kong’s police or by mainland troops.
The pro-democracy forces know they couldn’t fight martial law or an invasion, but they aren’t willing to give up their demands. Hence, their appearance Sunday outside the U.S. Consulate. They are hoping that the United States will employ its considerable leverage over Mr. Xi and Ms. Lam to deter the threatened repression.
Though it hasn’t been able to force Mr. Xi to make concessions on trade or stop fortifying islets in the South China Sea, the Trump administration has far-reaching influence over Hong Kong. More than 1,200 U.S. companies do business there, and
60 percent of foreign investment in China flows through the city, thanks to a U.S. law that designates it as a separate economic entity with the privileges of an open economy.
Unfortunately, President Trump has responded weakly to the protests and China’s threats. After weeks of praising Mr. Xi for tolerating “riots
” and expressing confidence that the Chinese dictator could quickly orchestrate a “happy and enlightened ending,” he reluctantly conceded late last month that a crackdown might make a trade deal impossible — not because of him, mind you, but because of “political sentiment.”
No wonder the demonstrators are appealing to Congress. They delivered a petition to the consulate calling for passage of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which is pending in both the House and Senate. The measure would require an annual review of Hong Kong’s special economic status, and it would mandate sanctions on officials found to be suppressing “basic freedoms” in the territory. The sanctions might slow the recent wave of arrests of opposition leaders, while the reporting requirement signals that, as Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a sponsor, says, the “nuclear option” of canceling Hong Kong’s special status will be on the table in the event of a larger crackdown.
The legislation appears to have bipartisan support: Both House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have spoken favorably about it. They should move swiftly to pass the bill, and Mr. Trump should sign it. Now is the time to send a clear message of deterrence to Beijing — and to show Hong Kong’s democracy movement that the United States is unambiguously on its side.
The Post’s View: Hong Kong’s protests challenge everything Xi Jinping stands for. How will he react?
The Post’s View: China has misread the Hong Kong protests from the start. It’s time to get it right.
Daniel Nieh: Hong Kong’s cultural independence is at risk. If it dies, the rest of us will lose, too.
Jackson Diehl: History will remember how Trump responded to Hong Kong
Marco Rubio: China is showing its true nature in Hong Kong. The U.S. must not watch from the sidelines.