Real life doesn’t happen that way. Actual white supremacists and homophobes don’t stroll through the streets of Chicago on a bitterly cold night, carrying a hate-crimes kit of rope and Clorox, hoping to chance upon someone who is black, gay and modestly famous. They don’t hurl perfectly scripted insults. They don’t vanish without a trace.
The minute I heard Smollett’s story, I suspected it would eventually fall apart — and I feared the potential consequences for genuine victims of genuine hate crimes.
Smollett was arrested just one day after federal authorities released evidence of the kind of grave threat that really does exist. They announced the arrest of Christopher Paul Hasson, a 49-year-old U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant and self-described white nationalist, for allegedly amassing a deadly arsenal in his Silver Spring home and planning to assassinate a list of public officials and journalists, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and MSNBC host Joe Scarborough.
The menace of such white-supremacist terrorism is real and growing. Debacles such as Smollett’s apparent hoax do nothing but provide excuses to ignore the threat.
Were the news media too credulous in their initial reporting about Smollett’s claim? Not necessarily. A well-known person reported being assaulted, and Chicago police said they were taking his story seriously. Smollett had suffered some minor injuries and been treated at a hospital. I don’t know what reporters were supposed to do except report the facts as far as they were known — absent concrete evidence that those facts were actually fabrications.
Police now say that the scratches on Smollett’s face were self-inflicted and that he paid two men $3,500 to rough him up — gently — so he could become more famous and demand more money for his role in the Fox television series “Empire.” But nobody knew that at first. When new facts gradually emerged that cast doubt on Smollett’s account, those facts were reported.
I also don’t blame the fellow “Empire” cast members who stood by Smollett. It is only natural to want to support a friend and colleague who is in crisis.
But politicians who rushed to use Smollett’s account as a shocking sign of the times — Sens. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) both called it an “attempted modern-day lynching,” for example — were foolish to do so. The story was shaky from the beginning, and a little early caution would have made unnecessary a lot of eventual backpedaling.
Was there, in general, an eagerness to believe Smollett because of the atmosphere President Trump has created? Probably — and, I would argue, quite understandably.
According to the FBI, there were 7,175 hate-crime incidents in this country in 2017 — a big jump from 2016, when there were 6,121 such incidents. (Those figures surely minimize the real problem, because many jurisdictions do not report hate crimes to the FBI at all.) Regarding incidents in 2017 in which victims were targeted because of race, 2,013 attacks were against African Americans vs. 741 against whites. Of incidents in which victims were targeted because of religion, the vast majority were against Jews and Muslims. There were more than 1,000 anti-LGBTQ incidents vs. just 32 classified as anti-heterosexual.
No, Trump isn’t telling people to go out and commit hate crimes. But the white-supremacist lunatic who killed 11 innocent Jews in a Pittsburgh synagogue in October was apparently motivated, somehow, by Trump’s apocalyptic rhetoric about illegal immigration. It’s not hard to see why, to some, Smollett’s story might have seemed plausible.
Trump didn’t actually put words in Smollett’s mouth, though. The actor allegedly made the decision to lie and should now face the consequences.
Police officials in Chicago, where the murder rate is out of control, had to waste time and resources on a wild goose chase. Even worse, the next victim of an actual hate crime might not be believed. By allegedly feigning injury to himself, Smollett grievously injured untold others.