The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Opinion Trump is treating TikTok as a cudgel against China. It’s the wrong approach.

(Florence Lo/Reuters)
Comment

PRESIDENT TRUMP has a plan sure to make plenty of teenagers very unhappy: ban the video-sharing app TikTok to punish China for its handling of the novel coronavirus crisis.

The Beijing-based company ByteDance purchased what is now TikTok three years ago, and the platform has since surged in popularity. More than 175 million people in the United States have downloaded it; Generation Z in particular has adopted it as a go-to. Axing the app would deprive Americans of a favorite outlet for free expression — and yet TikTok’s provenance does pose real privacy risks that shouldn’t be ignored. Which is why treating the tool as a geopolitical cudgel rather than engaging in a thoughtful assessment about its role here is exactly the wrong approach.

TikTok’s connection to China invites legitimate concerns about data mining. Though TikTok is mostly full of goofy lip-synching and perplexing meme-making, it collects far more than what its users post — from IP addresses to locations to browsing histories. This is true of most social media sites, and the surest guard against the practice would be a sensible federal privacy law. But most social media sites in the United States aren’t under the thumb of an authoritarian regime. Certainly, allegations of a real-time information pipeline to the Politburo are far-fetched; no evidence exists to show that TikTok has given information to Chinese authorities so far. But the question isn’t only what has happened; it’s what could happen. President Xi Jinping’s government does have the ability to demand data of domestic firms, leaving them little option but to comply.

These worries would make it reasonable for the federal government to bar employees from downloading TikTok, as the military has already done. Whether it’s reasonable to prevent everyday Americans is a more difficult question. Today’s meme-making 13-year-old could admittedly be tomorrow’s intelligence analyst with a high-level clearance, and it’s possible that a cache of knowledge about young people’s habits could prove useful in future election interference efforts. These questions are precisely those the ongoing national security review of TikTok should answer — as well as whether any threats could be addressed through a change in ownership structure.

TikTok has been gesturing at such a change itself. The company has also tried to distance itself from China by pulling out of Hong Kong in response to Beijing’s imposition of a sweeping security law on the formerly semi-autonomous region. Yet the White House has signaled that none of these steps will appease it. The point, it seems, really is retribution against another country rather than protection of this one. TikTok won’t be the last app from abroad to raise security worries at home. The United States needs a lawful process, based on objective criteria, to evaluate them — or else it only accepts China’s techno-nationalism as its own.

Read more:

The Post’s View: India isn’t just fracturing the Internet with its ban on Chinese apps. It’s shrinking it.

The Post’s View: Could TikTok allow China to export repression?

The Post’s View: TikTok and the long arm of the Chinese government

Molly Roberts: Gen Z’s strategy to ruin Trump’s rally looks a little too familiar

Loading...