The Washington Post

Why no ‘Hot Stove League’ for hockey?

The Washington Capitals’ season ended May 12, and that was quickly followed by an annual tradition — the virtual disappearance of coverage of the Caps from The Post’s Sports section.

In the past five weeks, there have been a few paragraphs here and there, reporting that the Caps would not resign popular veterans Mike Knuble and Jeff Halpern, and an article previewing this weekend’s draft, but Post columnists have been almost entirely silent about the team and the decisions it faces in the offseason, such as what coach to hire and whether to re-sign one of the team’s top scorers.

Even though the Caps are the second-most popular team in town, based on 2011 TV ratings, The Post offers much more offseason analysis of the Redskins, Nationals and even the Wizards than of the Caps.

Why is this so? Do the editors and columnists just not care enough about the team, or do they not know enough to offer any valuable insight? I’m not sure which is worse.

Eric Fingerhut, Bethesda

Show Comments
Washington Post Subscriptions

Get 2 months of digital access to The Washington Post for just 99¢.

A limited time offer for Apple Pay users.

Buy with
Cancel anytime

$9.99/month after the two month trial period. Sales tax may apply.
By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service, Digital Products Terms of Sale & Privacy Policy.

Get 2 months of digital access to The Washington Post for just 99¢.

Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing
Read content from allstate
Content from Allstate This content is paid for by an advertiser and published by WP BrandStudio. The Washington Post newsroom was not involved in the creation of this content. Learn more about WP BrandStudio.
We went to the source. Here’s what matters to millennials.
A state-by-state look at where Generation Y stands on the big issues.