Accessibility statementSkip to main content
Search Input
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
Advertisement
Facebook
Twitter
MailSolid
Home
Print
ChevronLeftAll Post podcasts
The Post's premier daily podcast, featuring unparalleled reporting, expert insight and clear analysis, every weekday afternoon.
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yet
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yet

On Tuesday in a surprise hearing, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson gave the most damning testimony to date on President Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

Tuesday, June 28, 2022
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yet
Loading...
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yetCassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, participates in the hearing Tuesday of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

It didn’t take long to find out why the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol chose to hold a surprise hearing on Tuesday: Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson provided what quickly became clear was the most damning testimony to date on President Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6.


Reporter Aaron Blake says her testimony is particularly important when it comes to just how much Trump cultivated and even desired the insurrection itself — and whether, crucial from a legal standpoint, his effort to overturn the election was corrupt.


Hutchinson stitched together repeated warnings — some involving Trump himself, including that he was warned that his Jan. 6 rallygoers had weapons — about what might happen. Despite these warnings, aides struggled to talk Trump out of a plan to march to the Capitol. And despite warnings about weapons in the crowd the morning of Jan. 6, Trump still directed people toward the Capitol in his speech.


Hutchinson, a former aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, said Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani had advocated for a march to the Capitol after Trump’s speech on the Ellipse. She said this prompted Meadows to worry “things might get real, real bad on Jan. 6.”


Follow all The Post’s coverage of the Jan. 6 hearings here.

Add to a podcast app
Listen to new episodes on your smartphone or other device.
Apple PodcastApple Podcasts
SpotifySpotify
Google PodcastsGoogle Podcasts
Amazon MusicAmazon Music
StitcherStitcher
RSSRSS
Get episode via email
Receive each new episode in your inbox.
Play on a smart speakerChevronDown
Amazon Echo

Enable the Flash Briefing in the Amazon Skill store or search for "The Washington Post" in the Skill section of your Alexa app. Then ask, "Alexa, what's my Flash Briefing?" or "Alexa, what's the news?"

Google Home

Send Post Reports to your Google Assistant device or say, "Okay Google, play the news from Post Reports."

The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yet
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yet

On Tuesday in a surprise hearing, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson gave the most damning testimony to date on President Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

Tuesday, June 28, 2022
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yet
Loading...
The most damning Jan. 6 testimony yetCassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, participates in the hearing Tuesday of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

It didn’t take long to find out why the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol chose to hold a surprise hearing on Tuesday: Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson provided what quickly became clear was the most damning testimony to date on President Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6.


Reporter Aaron Blake says her testimony is particularly important when it comes to just how much Trump cultivated and even desired the insurrection itself — and whether, crucial from a legal standpoint, his effort to overturn the election was corrupt.


Hutchinson stitched together repeated warnings — some involving Trump himself, including that he was warned that his Jan. 6 rallygoers had weapons — about what might happen. Despite these warnings, aides struggled to talk Trump out of a plan to march to the Capitol. And despite warnings about weapons in the crowd the morning of Jan. 6, Trump still directed people toward the Capitol in his speech.


Hutchinson, a former aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, said Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani had advocated for a march to the Capitol after Trump’s speech on the Ellipse. She said this prompted Meadows to worry “things might get real, real bad on Jan. 6.”


Follow all The Post’s coverage of the Jan. 6 hearings here.

Previous Episode
She wanted an abortion. Now, she has twins.

She wanted an abortion. Now, she has twins.

In the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, the story of new parents Brooke and Billy offers a preview of what life could look like for people facing a wave of abortion bans around the country.

Monday, June 27, 2022
She wanted an abortion. Now, she has twins.
Next Episode
Congress passed gun control. Will it last?

Congress passed gun control. Will it last?

Congress notched a major legislative win last week by passing gun control legislation. But will a recent Supreme Court ruling on a concealed-carry law blunt the victory?

Wednesday, June 29, 2022
Congress passed gun control. Will it last?
Press Enter to skip to end of carousel
More podcasts
A seven-part investigative series telling the stories of two women, separated by decades and united by a shared refusal to stay silent.
“Can He Do That?” is The Post’s politics podcast, exploring the powers and limitations of American government in an era of deep division.
Special episodes of "Presidential" highlight moments in American and presidential history that are worth revisiting today.
Columnist James Hohmann talks every Friday with the author of a thought-provoking op-ed in The Washington Post.
El pódcast en español de The Washington Post.
An investigation into no-knock warrants in the American justice system — and what happens when accountability is flawed at every level.
End of carousel
Company
  • About The Post
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • WP Creative Group
  • Accessibility Statement
Get The Post
  • Gift Subscriptions
  • Mobile & Apps
  • Newsletters & Alerts
  • Washington Post Live
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post Store
  • Books & E-Books
  • Newspaper in Education
  • Print Archives (Subscribers Only)
  • e-Replica
  • Today’s Paper
Contact Us
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Contact the Opinions team
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Terms of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Print Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
washingtonpost.com © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
  • washingtonpost.com
  • © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
  • About The Post
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Request a Correction
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
  • Download the Washington Post App
  • Policies & Standards
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Print Products Terms of Sale
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices