President Trump did something this weekend that would have been unimaginable two years ago: He attacked Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) as being soft on voter fraud.

Yes, that Brian Kemp.

If there is a moment that speaks to the Trump campaign’s far-flung and unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud and irregularities, it might be Trump’s burgeoning rift with Georgia’s governor. Kemp, after all, had been a contender for Public Enemy No. 1 for Democrats in recent years when it comes to allegedly overambitious efforts to tackle fraud. They have frequently accused him of thinly veiled attempts to suppress the votes of minorities, in particular. All of that came to a head in 2018 when he narrowly won his gubernatorial election after purging more than a million voters from Georgia’s rolls as secretary of state.

To Trump, though, Kemp is apparently something amounting to a RINO — Republican in Name Only.

“The governor’s done nothing,” Trump complained Sunday on Fox News Channel. “He’s done absolutely nothing. I’m ashamed that I endorsed him. But I look at what’s going on. It’s so terrible.”

Trump then tweeted at Kemp on Monday morning, calling him the “hapless Governor of Georgia” and urging him to overrule Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R).

Leaning on public officials is one thing, but the specific public officials being leaned on is quite another. Both Kemp and Raffensperger have repeatedly warned about voter fraud in recent years, often taking steps derided by Democrats.

At the top of that list is Kemp. Democrats labeled his effort to remove more than a million voters from Georgia’s voter rolls as voter suppression. More than half a million were purged on a single day in 2017, including more than 100,000 for not voting in recent elections. He also drew heat for holding up more than 50,000 new registrations on the eve of the 2018 election, citing a strict and contentious state law.

But his controversial history with combating supposed fraud dates back well before then.

Elected Republicans on Nov. 29 fell short of saying President Trump should drop inquiries into claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election. (The Washington Post)

While running for secretary of state in 2009, Kemp made voter fraud his calling card, saying, “If it comes down on my watch, we’ll come down on them hard.”

Shortly after assuming office in January 2010, he launched a Stop Voter Fraud website and hotline.

He quickly emerged as a major proponent of voter ID bills. In 2010, he testified in front of Texas legislators considering a bill similar to one passed in Georgia. Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Tex.) accused Republicans like Kemp of trying to “skim” marginal Democratic voters off the top. Kemp defended the effort by saying, “We have not disenfranchised anyone … especially any minority group.”

In 2011, he wrote a Washington Post letter to the editor in which he rebuked columnist E.J. Dionne for arguing that voter ID laws were meant to discourage voting. “Mr. Dionne argued that photo ID and related election-security laws are not needed because voter fraud ‘is not a major problem,’ ” Kemp wrote. “As chairman of the Georgia State Election Board, I can attest that every year we investigate and penalize hundreds of people guilty of election and voter fraud, and we work with county district attorneys to prosecute them on criminal charges.”

In 2013, he argued against same-day voter registration by citing fraud. The same year, the Supreme Court ruled against requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, with none other than conservative Justice Antonin Scalia writing the lopsided 7-to-2 opinion. Kemp said he was “very disappointed” with the ruling.

From the start of his tenure as secretary of state until his election as governor, Kemp purged about 1.4 million voters from Georgia’s rolls, with Democratic opponent Stacey Abrams long questioning his legitimacy because of it. After he won the 2018 race for governor, the newly Democratic-controlled U.S. House sent letters to him and his successor, Raffensperger, saying they were investigating the situation.

And while Raffensperger has recently emerged as a key voice when it comes to the integrity of the 2020 vote, he, too, has found himself under fire for his actions. He continued Kemp’s purge in 2019, with more than 300,000 purged — a number that made up about 4 percent of the state’s voter base.

As with Kemp, when Raffensperger was first running for secretary of state, voter fraud was a key focus of the GOP primary and beyond. At the time, Raffensperger repeatedly said his goal was “to make sure only Americans vote in our elections.”

He added in that campaign that absentee ballots were “the greatest doorway to voter fraud.” He also called absentee voting “the biggest entry point for voter fraud.”

In April, with mail ballots expanding amid the coronavirus outbreak — in a move somewhat similar to Kemp’s a decade prior — Raffensperger launched a task force to root out potential fraud. The state Democratic Party at the time called it “state-sponsored voter intimidation.”

Raffensperger also earned Democrats’ ire when in September he launched an inquiry into and threatened criminal action against 1,000 people he said had cast multiple ballots in the state’s primary. He said at the time that he was unconcerned whether it was done intentionally or unintentionally, citing one person who was allegedly “bragging” about voting twice.

“At the end of the day, the voter was responsible, and the voters know what they were doing,” Raffensperger said. “A double voter knows exactly what they were doing, diluting the votes of each and every voter that follows the law.”

That this man has now, less than three months later, been branded by Trump allies as a squish on voter fraud is pretty indicative of where we are in this moment. That he is now joined in that distinction by Kemp is even more of a statement. And that they are joined in the White House’s crosshairs by another Republican who rooted out actual fraud in Philadelphia — City Commissioner Al Schmidt (R) — but has downplayed concerns about this election tells you just about all you need to know about the actual evidence here.

Many Republicans have been pretty quiet about Trump’s allegations. But perhaps the bigger point is that others who have shown a real desire to focus on alleged fraud have been unwilling to go along with the charade. And they’ve been doing it undoubtedly knowing full well that these Trump nasty-grams awaited them.