Vice President Harris said Tuesday that she will visit the U.S.-Mexico border and rejected Republican criticism as “shortsighted” for failing to recognize the reason migrants are coming to the United States. Harris made the comments at a news conference after meeting with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador in Mexico City as part of the second leg of her trip focused on addressing the root causes behind a surge in migration from Central America to the U.S. southern border.
Talks between President Biden and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), the GOP point person on infrastructure spending, ended with no agreement as financing the plan with increases in corporate taxes proved unacceptable to Republicans. The White House said Biden would talk Tuesday afternoon with other senators about infrastructure as well.
Here’s what to know:
White House infrastructure talks with Capito collapse, leading to finger-pointing as Biden shifts strategy
Return to menuBiden ended negotiations with a group of Republicans led by Capito over his infrastructure package Tuesday as the two sides failed to strike a deal after weeks of talks.
A key part of Biden’s domestic agenda now enters a new, uncertain phase, as the president shifts his focus to a separate group of Democrats and Republicans in hopes of reaching a compromise. But the failure to reach a deal with Capito, something liberals had warned was inevitable, could increase pressure on Biden to ultimately try to forge ahead with only Democrats as he did during the push for a stimulus measure earlier this year.
The White House and Capito proved unable to bridge their differences, and they remained far apart on the scope of the package and whether to make changes to tax law to pay for it. Now Biden will attempt to negotiate with a group of Democrats and Republicans at once, a challenge that could prove more difficult but ultimately lead to more votes.
Analysis: GOP moves to excise a word it once used for Jan. 6
Return to menuTwo events Tuesday reinforced just how much revisionism regarding the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol is prevailing in GOP ranks, in subtle but highly pertinent ways.
The Senate early in the day released the first big report on Jan. 6, but the report conspicuously avoided a specific word: “insurrection.” The word appeared 11 times in the report, but only when directly quoting someone or citing a report that used it. CNN quoted those involved, saying it was left out to ensure the bipartisanship of the report — i.e. Republicans, at best, viewed it as overly provocative.
Reinforcing that gradually emerging reality later Tuesday was a Q&A with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). Asked about whether the Capitol riot was an insurrection, he demurred, citing his past commentary on the matter and suggesting that should suffice.
Terry McAuliffe wins Democratic nomination for Virginia governor
Return to menuFormer Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe won the Democratic nomination for governor Tuesday night, pulling away from four rival candidates early with a commanding lead as he pursued a chance to run for a second term in office.
Faced with a historically diverse set of choices, many voters expressed a pragmatic desire for a nominee who would have the best chance of winning in November against Republican candidate Glenn Youngkin, a former private equity executive selected in a GOP convention last month.
McAuliffe, who served from 2014 to 2018, seemed to fit that bill as a popular former governor who might have run for reelection after that term except that the Virginia Constitution prohibits a second consecutive span in the Executive Mansion. He is also a prodigious fundraiser, which is likely to be put to the test against Youngkin, a multimillionaire who could spur the most expensive gubernatorial race in state history.
Harris on voting rights: ‘If we don’t stand up for our democracy, I mean, what do we have left worth fighting for?’
Return to menuVice President Harris on Tuesday said the Biden administration will continue to push for federal legislation on voting rights, even as chances in the Senate dimmed for a Democratic-led bill aimed at combating restrictive laws recently passed by GOP state legislatures.
“These laws that are being passed are so transparently going to have the effect of impeding, suppressing and making it more difficult for people to vote,” Harris said during a news conference in Mexico City.
Earlier Tuesday, an all-hands push by some of the nation’s top civil rights leaders failed to dissuade Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) from his opposition to a major Democratic voting rights bill, leaving advocates with few clear options.
While Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is backing the alternative bill, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has made clear that most Republicans would oppose it, calling it an “unnecessary” license for the Justice Department to intervene in state election laws.
Harris said the Biden administration is “not going to give up talking” about ways to move forward. She framed the decision facing lawmakers as one that goes to the heart of what America stands for.
“Honestly, the bottom line on this is that if we don’t stand up for our democracy, I mean, what do we have left worth fighting for?” Harris said.
She added: “I think most Americans, you know, when we raise our hand and place hand on chest and pledge allegiance, when we talk about patriotism, when we talk about pride ... we understand that the fundamental right to vote is one of the highest ideals and measures of who we say we are. So let’s be who we say we are. How about that?”
Harris says she will visit U.S.-Mexico border, calls GOP critics ‘shortsighted’ for not focusing on root causes of migration
Return to menuDuring a news conference in Mexico City on Tuesday afternoon, Harris pledged to visit the U.S. border with Mexico and fired back at Republican critics who have pressed her to go, calling them “shortsighted” for not focusing on the root causes of migration from Central America to the United States.
Speaking after meeting with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Harris told reporters she has already “spent a lot of time” at the border during her years as senator from California.
“And so let’s talk about what’s going on in the places that are causing the issue at the border,” she said. “I think it’s shortsighted for any of us who are in the business of problem-solving to suggest we’re only going to respond to the reaction as opposed to addressing the cause.”
During her trip this week, Harris has been peppered with questions from reporters on why a visit to the border was not included on her itinerary. She has repeatedly said that she will go at some point and has defended her decision, arguing that she is not “not discounting the importance of the border.”
Democratic state lawmakers step up pressure on congressional Democrats to enact voting protections
Return to menuPressure on congressional Democrats to enact federal voting protections mounted outside Washington on Tuesday, as Democratic state lawmakers trying to fend off hundreds of proposals to curtail voting access grow increasingly frustrated over the inaction in Washington.
Much of the focus Tuesday centered on Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), who met with civil rights leaders but remained undeterred in his opposition to the For the People Act, Democrats’ far-reaching elections, ethics and campaign finance overhaul that has the backing of top party leaders including President Biden.
In addition, however, more than three dozen state lawmakers from Arizona delivered a letter Tuesday to Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) telling her that “more leadership is necessary” to pass the For the People Act. Sinema is a co-sponsor of the bill, but lawmakers said they are dissatisfied with her lack of urgency or advocacy for it.
“As fellow Arizona legislators we are calling upon you with respect and urgency to stand up in this crucial moment for our state and for our country and to make the promise of our democracy real for us all,” the letter states. In an interview, state Rep. Athena Salman, one of the signatories, said: “The thing that’s so frustrating is that urgency to do the bare minimum to fight for and protect our democracy — I just have yet to see it from our senior senator.”
A spokesman for Sinema defended the senator, saying she “strongly believes the right to vote, faith in the integrity of our electoral process, and trust in elected officials are critical to the health and vitality of our democracy,” and is “committed to working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to strengthen our democracy and strengthen Americans’ confidence in our government.”
Similarly, dozens of Texas lawmakers have signed a letter to Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Biden underscoring what they described as the urgent need for federal action given the near-certainty that Republicans will try again to pass voting restrictions in the state after Democrats blocked action last week.
The letter will be delivered Wednesday, according to several Texas Democrats who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a draft document. The letter exhorts Congress to show the same commitment to voting rights that state House Democrats demonstrated in Austin on May 30, when they staged a walkout that scuttled a piece of voting legislation known as Senate Bill 7 by denying Republicans a quorum.
“Democrats in Texas are doing all we can to sound the alarms in Washington at the federal level,” state Rep. Chris Turner, the chairman of the Texas House Senate Democratic Caucus, said in an interview Tuesday. “The attack on voting rights that we have seen here in Texas — that is not new from Texas Republicans, but it is escalating. We need, and Texas voters need, protections from the federal government to see that Republicans don’t get away with disenfranchising voters in this state and across the country.”
Follow live results in Virginia and New Jersey primary elections
Return to menuPolls close in Virginia’s primaries at 7 p.m. Eastern, with Democratic nominations for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general on the ballot, along with contested Democratic and Republican primaries for state House of Delegates seats. Terry McAuliffe, a former governor, is seeking a comeback against four other Democrats.
Will New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy become the first Democrat reelected to that office since the 1970s? He has no primary challenger, while Republicans are selecting their nominee today. Polls close at 8 p.m. Eastern.
Trump congratulates Nigeria on banning Twitter
Return to menuFormer president Donald Trump on Tuesday congratulated Nigeria on indefinitely suspending Twitter after the social media giant temporarily froze the account of the country’s president.
“Congratulations to the country of Nigeria, who just banned Twitter because they banned their President,” Trump said in a statement issued through his Save America PAC. “More COUNTRIES should ban Twitter and Facebook for not allowing free and open speech — all voices should be heard. In the meantime, competitors will emerge and take hold. Who are they to dictate good and evil if they themselves are evil? Perhaps I should have done it while I was President. But Zuckerberg kept calling me and coming to the White House for dinner telling me how great I was. 2024?”
The statement is Trump’s latest salvo against American social media giants — although he has not previously gone so far as to congratulate another country for adopting such a ban.
Twitter in January indefinitely banned Trump, citing the risk of further incitement of violence after the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob. Facebook, too, cited public safety in its decision to ban Trump from the platform for two years. The company said last week it will reinstate the former president only if “the risk to public safety has receded.”
Last week, Twitter removed a post by Nigeria’s president, Muhammadu Buhari, that vowed to punish separatists in the nation’s southeast whom authorities have blamed for attacks on federal property.
“Many of those misbehaving today are too young to be aware of the destruction and loss of lives that occurred during the Nigerian Civil War,” wrote Buhari, a retired general, referring to the 1967-1970 conflict. “Those of us in the fields for 30 months, who went through the war, will treat them in the language they understand.”
Twitter deleted Buhari’s post, calling it abusive.
Danielle Paquette contributed to this report.
Talks between Biden and Capito end with no agreement on infrastructure; White House shifts focus to bipartisan group
Return to menuWeeks of talks between Biden and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) on an infrastructure plan ended Tuesday with no agreement and the White House shifted its focus to dealing with a bipartisan group of lawmakers.
Capito said Tuesday she was “disappointed” in Biden’s decision to end negotiations with her and other Republicans regarding his infrastructure plans after weeks of failed attempts to find common ground.
The Republican lawmaker emerged as one of the GOP leaders charged with persuading the president to end his effort to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy Americans to pay for his proposal. But ultimately, Capito and her conservative peers were unsuccessful.
“After negotiating in good faith and making significant progress to move closer to what the president wanted, I am disappointed by his decision,” she said in a statement.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement that Biden told Capito that the latest offer from her group “did not, in his view, meet the essential needs of our country to restore our roads and bridges, prepare us for our clean energy future, and create jobs.” Biden also was disappointed, Psaki said, “that, while he was willing to reduce his plan by more than $1 trillion, the Republican group had increased their proposed new investments by only $150 billion.”
Biden spoke with Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and urged them to continue trying to develop a bipartisan proposal.
Republicans were frequently criticized for being unwilling to partner with Democrats on initiatives and projects that liberals said would have benefited Americans in red states. But Capito said she and her conservative colleagues always engaged the president “in good faith.”
Ultimately, Biden — who had already decreased the budget of his original plan in an effort to attract Republicans — was not willing to make further cuts or to walk away from his belief that wealthier Americans and companies should contribute more to fund efforts.
Congressional Democrats target legal immunity for Sackler family
Return to menuA bill aimed at preventing those who have not filed for bankruptcy from receiving bankruptcy-like protections may not pass in time to change the fate of the billionaire family it is named after, House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) acknowledged Tuesday.
The SACKLER Act, filed after Sackler family members sought legal immunity from government-filed lawsuits through their company Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy, has not received Republican support, and GOP members pushed back against it at the hearing about the legislation Tuesday.
Under the company’s bankruptcy plan, the OxyContin maker would be transformed into a publicly owned entity that the Sacklers would not have involvement in. Members of the Sackler family would pay nearly $4.3 billion over a decade, and in exchange, the family, their companies and other firms related to them would be legally released from facing opioid-related lawsuits.
“We must pass the SACKLER Act before the bankruptcy plan is confirmed and the Sackler family will practically get off scot-free,” Maloney, a bill sponsor, told reporters during a press call.
When asked if she believed the act would be passed soon enough to meaningfully affect the outcome of the Purdue bankruptcy case, Maloney stressed her efforts to push the bill forward but acknowledged the forthcoming Aug. 9 final confirmation hearing for the company’s restructuring plan in a bankruptcy court in White Plains, N.Y.
“I’m going to give it everything I have,” she said. “I can’t say that it’s obviously going to pass because I really don’t know. I’m trying.”
During Tuesday’s hearing, Democrats and Republicans clashed, as some GOP members argued Democrats should not interfere with ongoing court cases against drug companies filed by cities, counties, states and other jurisdictions for the damage inflicted by the opioid epidemic.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey (D) and Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden (R) testified in favor of the legislation, as did Patrick Radden Keefe, writer for the New Yorker and author of “Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty,” and Alexis Pleus, an addiction recovery advocate who lost her son Jeff to a heroin overdose in 2014.
The Sackler family denies their personal responsibility for the opioid crisis.
During a congressional hearing in December, former Purdue board member Kathe Sackler expressed regret over Purdue’s involvement in testimony given after the committee threatened the Sacklers with subpoenas.
“There is nothing that I can find that I would have done differently based on what I believed and understood then,” she said.
In a joint statement from the heirs of Mortimer and Raymond Sackler, two of the three brothers who bought Purdue Frederick, the predecessor to Purdue Pharma, in 1952, the family said, “The proposed settlement will provide billions of dollars for comprehensive opioid abatement programs to communities in need and allocate resources equitably across the country, and it has the support of state and local governments representing more than half the U.S. population along with thousands of private plaintiffs."
Rep. Mo Brooks pushes falsehood that Trump won 2020 election, claims unlawful votes for Biden
Return to menuRep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) is continuing to promote the false claim that former president Donald Trump won the 2020 election, ahead of a battle for the seat of Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.).
There is no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election. Nonetheless, in an interview Monday with the Washington Examiner, Brooks asserted that Trump beat Biden “if only lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens were counted.”
He argued that there is “overwhelming and compelling” evidence to support the claim — although he provided none. He said that “somewhere in the neighborhood of 900,000 to 1.7 million noncitizens voted in the 2020 presidential election overwhelmingly for Joe Biden,” but provided no data to back up those numbers.
Senate confirms Biden’s first pair of judicial nominees in bipartisan votes
Return to menuSenate Republicans joined Democrats Tuesday to confirm Biden’s first pair of judicial nominees in what Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) called an “important milestone” for the new administration.
In a 72-to-28 vote, the Senate approved the nomination of Regina Rodriguez, a former federal prosecutor, to serve on the District Court in Colorado.
Earlier Tuesday, lawmakers voted 66-to-33 to approve Julien Neals to serve on New Jersey’s District Court bench, which is shorthanded and facing a backlog of federal cases. Seventeen Republicans backed Neals, the acting Bergen County administrator and county counsel.
Schumer said Neals’s confirmation marks “the first, but certainly not the last, not even close” of Biden’s judicial nominees to clear the Senate.
Both Neals and Rodriguez were previously tapped by President Barack Obama, but their nominations stalled in the Republican-controlled Senate.
Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Biden’s nominees “will bring much needed experiential and demographic diversity to our nation’s courts.” Neals is African American, and Rodriguez is the daughter of a Japanese American mother and Latino father.
“The face of justice is often as important as the fact of justice,” Durbin said on the Senate floor.
Biden is moving quickly to begin reshaping the federal judiciary with nominees from diverse personal and professional backgrounds. There are more than 100 current and future vacancies for Biden to fill on courts throughout the country.
Democrats are playing catch up to former president Donald Trump, who with the help of Senate Republicans successfully installed more than 200 judges, including three Supreme Court justices, at a record pace.
Schumer said Democrats still pursuing reconciliation as a backup for infrastructure plan
Return to menuSenate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Democrats are still focused on the process known as reconciliation to ensure passage of President Biden’s infrastructure bill as the president’s efforts to find common ground with Republicans remained stalled.
“We all know as a caucus we will not be able to do all the things that the country needs in a totally bipartisan way,” he said. “So at the same time, we are pursuing the pursuit of reconciliation.”
Reconciliation is the path by which the Senate can pass some legislation with only a majority of votes — 51 lawmakers or 50 with the vice president breaking the tie — under limited budget rules. Doing so allows it to avoid a filibuster, which would require 60 votes to overcome.
Republicans have balked at Biden’s infrastructure proposal, one of his top domestic priorities, because of his effort to raise corporate taxes and to fund projects not traditionally included in infrastructure plans. In negotiations with Republicans, Biden has made several concessions, including coming down from his initial top-line amount of $1.7 trillion.
Schumer suggested that despite Biden’s preference for legislation passed through bipartisanship, Democrats may have to look to reconciliation to make the president’s vision for the United States a reality.
“And it may well be that part of the bill that will pass may be bipartisan and part of it will be through reconciliation,” Schumer added. “But we’re not going to sacrifice the bigness and boldness in this bill.”
Schumer said the Biden White House’s negotiations with Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), “seem to be running into a brick wall.” But he praised a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers as a group that is “trying to put something together that might be closer to what the president needs.”
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) tweeted Tuesday that he brought up the need to fund flood resiliency programs and energy provisions in his conversation with the president. He also expressed his support for Capito’s efforts to get Biden to give more attention to Republicans’ concerns with the bill.
“Any infrastructure package should and must be bipartisan,” he said.
McConnell opposes John Lewis voting rights bill, calls it ‘unnecessary’
Return to menuSenate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) threw cold water on the notion that a voting rights bill named after the late congressman and civil rights icon John Lewis could gain bipartisan support in the Senate.
That bill would reauthorize parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act struck down by the Supreme Court in 2013 that provided federal oversight of elections in states with a history of discriminating against minority communities.
Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), who is opposed to the Democrats’ more wide-reaching voting rights bill, has suggested the John Lewis measure could be a bipartisan vehicle for voting rights issues, though currently only GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) has signaled support for it, and when it passed the House in 2019 only one Republican voted for it.
McConnell argued that restoring those 1965 protections would give the federal government “almost total ability to determine the voting systems of every state in America” and that other parts of the Voting Rights Act remained intact.
“The Supreme Court concluded that conditions that existed in 1965 no longer existed,” McConnell said. “So there’s no threat to the voting rights law. It’s against the law to discriminate in voting on the basis of race already. And so I think it’s unnecessary.”
Democrats point to states pushing for stricter voters laws that would disproportionately suppress the vote in communities of color as evidence for why the federal oversight is still needed.