The Washington Post

All feds pay the price for GSA scandal


As could have been expected, the scandal about the exorbitant 2010 General Services Administration conference at a gambling casino just outside Las Vegas has become a political football and federal employees are the ones getting tackled.

The latest example is a second video released Monday by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. The video, which was played at the conference, shows GSA employees promoting, with signs and song, their energy-saving efforts to “go green.” Among their lyrics, “POTUS wants a press event, a project he can show.”

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns. View Archive

In any other context, this would be harmless stuff.

But the inspector general’s report on the conference, a gathering that cost more than $822,000 for about 300 people, has rightly ignited a storm of indignation. That storm now makes the benign look malignant.

“Idiots” was the one-word description of the federal employees in the video from someone who posted a comment on YouTube. “Unbelievable how corrupt people can be,” posted another, although there’s not a hint of corruption in the video.

A screen shot of the GSA video shown at the conference. (GSA)

Other viewers, however, indicated Issa may have overplayed his hand with the video. One self-identified conservative said, “I think the shock here is over reach.” Another: “I’m a Republican, and this looks absolutely fine to me.”

One person had this advice: “Geesh people lighten up.”

A different video shown at the conference and released by Issa last week shows a ukulele-playing GSA worker mocking GSA spending. The headline on Issa’s press release: “Federal Worker ‘American Idle’ Uncovered.”

So as a result of the GSA conference, the federal worker is being portrayed as a corrupt, idle idiot. Three top GSA officials lost their jobs because of the conference, including former administrator Martha N. Johnson, even before the report was released. Five others were suspended, including, my colleague Lisa Rein reported Monday, the official who appeared in the ukulele video rewarding the employee who made it.

Workers throughout the government will pay a price, too, and it will continue long after the news releases stop.

One federal employee probably spoke for many in a note posted to our Washington Post story that broke news about the report:

“Unfortunately for those of us in agencies where a. we don’t have money for conferences to begin with, and b. we aren’t even allowed funds to buy coffee when we have on site meetings, the result of the GSA excesses will be increased scrutiny of all travel and training requests. So all of us, honest thrifty agencies included, will have to jump through more hoops and spend more time justifying everything we do.

“Thanks for making life harder for the rest of us govvies, GSA!”

Members of Congress will make life harder for the Obama administration as they rush to beat each other with hearings into the conference scandal. If the White House hoped to quell reaction to the GSA debacle by dumping top agency officials before anyone outside the administration could demand it, those hopes have been dashed.

On Wednesday, Rep. John L. Mica (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Calif.), chairman of its public buildings subcommittee, announced an April 19 hearing on “GSA’s squandering of taxpayer dollars.” Not to be outdone, Issa said his committee will hold a hearing on April 16. It has an equally damning title: “GSA’s culture of wasteful spending.”

Democrats in the Senate also are getting in on the action. Sen. Richard J. Durbin (Ill.) told “Meet the Press” that his Appropriations subcommittee on general government will hold a hearing, and Sen. Barbara Boxer (Calif.), chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, has announced an April 18 hearing on the GSA report.

Certainly, a congressional probe of GSA is warranted, but where was all this congressional oversight before?

Don’t be surprised if Democrats go back beyond the 2010 conference in holding the agency accountable. On Friday, Politico reported that the big jump in GSA conference spending came under the Bush administration. The cost of similar GSA conferences rocketed from $93,000 in 2004 to $323,855 in 2006, a 248 percent increase.

And Republicans who complain that the Obama administration didn’t act quickly enough in dumping GSA officials might be reminded by Democrats that the previous Bush administration didn’t fire Lurita Doan, a former GSA administrator, until 11 months after the Office of Special Counsel called for her ouster for “engaging in the most pernicious of political activity.”

Congressional examination is appropriate, but four hearings is overkill. One casualty almost certainly will be the reputation of the federal workforce.

Read Joe Davidson’s previous columns at Follow the Federal Diary on Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
What happened in New Hampshire
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.