The Washington Post

Attorney General Holder unbowed on 9/11 trials, despite reversal

For Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., the past year has been something of a lonely pursuit.

He believed that the accused Sept. 11, 2001, conspirators should be tried not by the military but in federal court, saying such a trial would be the “defining event” of his tenure as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer. He kept pushing, even as the White House quietly shelved the idea and congressional Democrats joined Republicans in opposition.

That ended this week, when Holder stood before the cameras to say his plan was dead. He had lost the debate, and worse, he was publicly announcing a decision he clearly opposed. Visibly frustrated, he abruptly ended the news conference and left the stage.

Since he was nominated more than two years ago, Holder has occupied a unique place in the Obama administration. Perhaps more than any other Cabinet member, he has been a target for Republican attacks. Yet he enjoys a close relationship with President Obama and will be known to history as the nation’s first black attorney general.

Even as he announced Monday that Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators will be tried before a military commission at the Guantanamo Bay prison instead of in Manhattan federal court, Holder was unbowed.

“Look, I grew up in New York City, you know?” he said. “ . . . It is still my view that the case could have been tried in Manhattan.”

Holder’s words reflected his frustration that others didn’t agree, as well as his certainty — honed over more than two decades as a prosecutor, judge and private lawyer — that his path was the right one, according to law enforcement officials and people close to him.

The attorney general first announced in November 2009 the planned prosecution of Mohammed and his co-defendants in New York, a key change from the policies of the George W. Bush administration. Monday’s announcement not only reversed that plan but was a major blow to the administration’s efforts to close the detention center in Cuba.

“He is comforted by the fact that he still believes he was dead-on right, and he believes that’s how history will record it,” said Reid Weingarten, a Washington lawyer and close Holder friend. He said that Holder’s demeanor at the news conference “was just frustration” and that the opposition of some White House staffers and congressional Democrats to his plan for federal trials “sort of adds to that.”

Inside the Justice Department, the prevailing emotion on Tuesday, from the attorney general on down, was relief. Officials said the uncertainty about the trials had hampered their ability to draw attention to other priorities, such as a crackdown on health-care and financial fraud and the fight against violent crime.

“It’s liberating in a lot of ways,” said one Justice Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

On Capitol Hill, where Republican critics of the administration offered measured praise of the decision to try Mohammed at Guantanamo Bay, Holder’s sharp words for Congress did not go unnoticed. The attorney general on Monday blamed legislators for erecting barriers to bringing detainees to the United States.

“The first thing that struck us was the almost hostility to Congress,” said one GOP aide, who was not an authorized spokesperson and spoke on the condition of anonymity. “He obviously didn’t believe in his own position.”

But congressional aides in both parties, along with experts, said Holder’s defeat on the high-profile issue will not affect his ability to govern the sprawling department.

“This is obviously an important issue, but I don’t think it’s going to be the first line in his obituary,” said Michael Greenberger, a University of Maryland law professor and former Justice Department official. “There are many overwhelmingly important issues that the department handles.”

Soon after Holder was nominated for his post in December 2008, a chorus of GOP lawmakers questioned whether he would be too far to the left on national security. The criticism intensified over the administration’s handling of cases such as the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day in 2009.

But it was Holder’s plan for civilian trials for the Sept. 11 suspects that crystallized tensions over the administration’s national security policies. The announcement triggered strong opposition from congressional Republicans, who said the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were acts of war and should be prosecuted in a military tribunal.

Holder stood firm, telling the New Yorker in an interview last year that he believed that trying Mohammed in a federal courtroom would be “the defining event of my time as attorney general.”

As the case remained in limbo for much of the past year, Holder “held out as long as he could for some sliver of hope” for federal trials, said one federal law enforcement official who was not an authorized spokesperson.

But when Congress in December barred the transfer of Guantanamo Bay detainees to the United States for any reason, including prosecution, “it was clear to him . . . that the only viable alternative was a trial in military commissions,’’ a Justice Department official said.

In the end, according to officials and people close to Holder, he made the decision to pull the plug on civilian trials, with White House support. “I don’t think anybody issued an order or told him he had to,” said one friend of Holder’s, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. “He understands the way the world works. He’s a grown-up.”

Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.

Jerry Markon covers the Department of Homeland Security for the Post’s National Desk. He also serves as lead Web and newspaper writer for major breaking national news.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
New Hampshire primary: What to expect
New Hampshire will hold a traditional primary just eight days after the Iowa caucuses. Polling in the Granite state has historically been volatile in the final weeks before the primary. After the Iowa caucuses, many New Hampshire voters cement their opinions.
The Post's Ed O'Keefe says ...
Something has clicked for Bush in New Hampshire in the past few days. What has transpired by no means guarantees him a top-tier finish in Tuesday’s Republican primary here, but the crowds turning out to see him are bigger, his delivery on the stump is crisper and some of his key rivals have stumbled. At the least, the developments have mostly silenced talk of a hasty exit and skittish donors.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.