The Washington Post

Auditors: Defense Department slow to develop sexual-assault policies

The military does not always do enough to respond to victims of sexual assault, according to a report released Tuesday, a week after Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta announced that he was lifting the official ban on women in combat.

The report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that doctors, nurses and other military health-care providers are inconsistent in how they handle reports of sexual assault, mostly because guidance is lacking.

Required refresher training for health-care professionals is not always done, for example, leaving some unfamiliar with how to treat injuries sustained during an assault and how to protect their confidentiality, the report said.

GAO auditors found that the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, which tells the services how to respond to sexual assaults, has failed to communicate enough information to medical professionals in the field.

“Left unaddressed . . . limited health-care guidance and first responders’ inconsistent knowledge about available resources . . . can undermine DOD’s efforts to address the problem of sexual assault in the military by eroding servicemembers’ confidence in the department’s programs and decreasing the likelihood that victims will . . . seek care and treatment when needed,” auditors wrote.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced the end of a ban on women in combat roles. (The Washington Post)

They noted that sexual violence is a crime that requires a specialized level of care— making sure forensic evidence is properly collected, medical care is given in a way that minimizes the risk of another assault and helping victims make a confidential report.

“As a consequence, sexual assault victims who want to keep their case confidential may be reluctant to seek medical care,” the report found. It did not address the prevalence of sexual violence in the military. Defense officials told auditors that they disagreed with their conclusions, although they agreed that they need to step up compliance with annual refresher training on assault prevention and response.

The military received 3,192 reports of sexual assault in fiscal 2011, a 1 percent increase from 2010, according to a Defense Department annual report. Thousands of other cases go unreported, officials believe.

In another study last year, its military academies reported 80 such cases between October 2010 and June 2011, up 23 percent from the previous academic year.

Defense officials said they have been working for two years on procedures to improve the military’s prevention and response to sexual assaults. But they did not provide any details, auditors said.

The audit, and another released Tuesday by the GAO assessing whether female servicemembers in the Army are medically prepared to deploy, found that most installations provide adequate health care for women.

Routine services including breast exams, pap smears, pregnancy tests and contraceptives were available at 27 domestic installations auditors surveyed. Specialized services — including radiation for breast, ovarian and other cancers and treatment for abnormal pap smears — varied, but women were referred to civilian doctors or other bases.

But policies for responding to sexual assault — or a lack of them — remain troubling, auditors said. The issue is likely to get more attention as hundreds of thousands of front-line jobs open up to women. Roles for women in the military have been expanding and evolving to combat support, counterinsurgency operations and combat despite an official restriction on artillery, armor, infantry and other roles.

The services have taken various approaches to sexual assault, which the Pentagon has reported. At one clinic auditors visited, the written policy did not address when and where examinations should be done, how evidence should be given to police, and how to label the evidence so victims’ names are kept confidential.

The Defense Department reported that in 2011, the Army trained just 6,000 of the more than 17,000 medical personnel serving as victim advocates or assigned to respond to sexual violence, the audit said.

Lisa Rein covers the federal workforce and issues that concern the management of government.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debate tonight. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
He says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything in the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.