The Washington Post

Bill proposes cutting agency reports, which are swamping Congress

A House Democrat has introduced a bill to fix a problem that Congress itself created — an expensive pileup of written reports from federal agencies, many of them unnecessary and unread.

The solution: Every five years, get rid of almost all the reports and start over.

That plan is outlined in a measure that Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) wrote after reading an article in Sunday’s Washington Post.

The Post story described how Congress began requiring executive-branch agencies to send in written memos about their activities. The problem was that, over the decades, Congress asked for far more reports than lawmakers had time to read. Today, Congress is officially expecting about 4,291 reports, from 466 agencies and nonprofits.

In some cases, the reports have continued to arrive long after Congress ceased to care. Producing the official Dog and Cat Fur Protection Report, for instance, requires 15 federal employees and several weeks of work. But none of the seven congressional committees that actually receive the report find it useful.

“Too much work is being done researching, writing, compiling reports that go to Congress that aren’t necessary and aren’t read,” Bonamici said in an interview. “There are plenty of other things that agencies can and should be doing” instead, she said.

Bonamici’s bill would solve the problem by setting a “sunset” date, five years after the day her bill is enacted. On that day, every report required by law at that moment would be eliminated (unless Congress added a special clause to the law to protect it).

After that, Congress could ask for new reports. But, in another five years, the slate would be wiped clean again. And so on.

On Monday, Bonamici said her bill is co-sponsored by Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah). Still, it is likely to face an uphill fight in Congress. Earlier this year, an effort by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) to eliminate little-used reports ran into resistance from some committees, who didn’t want the reports they receive to go away.

In the end, the House voted to eliminate just 79 of the 4,291 reports.

David A. Fahrenthold covers Congress for the Washington Post. He has been at the Post since 2000, and previously covered (in order) the D.C. police, New England, and the environment.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
New Hampshire primary: What to expect
New Hampshire will hold a traditional primary just eight days after the Iowa caucuses. Polling in the Granite state has historically been volatile in the final weeks before the primary. After the Iowa caucuses, many New Hampshire voters cement their opinions.
The Post's Ed O'Keefe says ...
Something has clicked for Bush in New Hampshire in the past few days. What has transpired by no means guarantees him a top-tier finish in Tuesday’s Republican primary here, but the crowds turning out to see him are bigger, his delivery on the stump is crisper and some of his key rivals have stumbled. At the least, the developments have mostly silenced talk of a hasty exit and skittish donors.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.