The Washington Post

Boehner introduces alternative resolution on Libya

President Obama could get a second chance to sell Congress on the military operation in Libya, thanks to some last-minute help from an unlikely ally: House Speaker John A. Boehner.

On Thursday, with some liberals and conservatives trying to get Congress to force a withdrawal from Libya, Boehner (R-Ohio) offered an alternative. He introduced a resolution that would give Obama 14 more days to make his case.

Boehner’s resolution would vent congressional anger, stating that “the president has not sought, and Congress has not provided, authorization” for the operation. It also contains a threat that Congress might cut off funding if Obama defies Congress.

But the resolution stops short of demanding that the operation stop and doesn’t declare that Congress officially disapproves of it.

“It does not have Congress taking a stand,” said Rep. Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio), who had attracted more than 60 cosponsors for a separate bill saying that Congress disapproved of the Libya operation. Obama “has already had 75 days. I don’t believe that there’s additional information that he’s going to provide.”

The U.S. military joined the campaign to protect civilians against the forces of Moammar Gaddafi on March 19, and provides a significant amount of the logistical and intelligence support for the NATO-led effort. Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, Obama was required to obtain congressional approval for the campaign within 60 days of notifying Congress that it had started.

Last month, that deadline came and went.

The Senate reacted slowly: Legislators introduced a resolution supporting the effort, then went on recess. But this week, an unexpected coalition in the House has turned sharply against the effort.

On Wednesday, Republican leaders had to abruptly shelve a proposal from one of Congress’s perennial outliers — Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio) — that would have demanded Obama withdraw forces from the Libya campaign within 15 days. The bill turned out to have much broader support than expected.

Boehner’s resolution was intended as a less-drastic way to express congressional unhappiness. In a meeting with fellow Republicans on Thursday afternoon, Boehner said of Kucinich’s bill that it would be wrong to abruptly pull out of a NATO-led operation.

“We will have turned our backs against our NATO partners who have stuck by us for the last 10 years,” Boehner said, according to an account from an aide. A spokesman for Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said something similar Thursday: “To unilaterally abandon [the Libya] mission would have enormous and dangerous long-term consequences.”

On Friday, aides said, the House is expected to vote on both proposals. If Boehner’s resolution passes, some Republicans said they hope Obama takes advantage of the do-over.

At the White House on Thursday, however, press secretary Jay Carney gave no signal that Obama will change the way he has dealt with Congress on Libya.

“We believe that the goal the president has is shared by a vast majority of members of Congress,” Carney said. “And we have consulted with Congress every step of the way since we have initiated this policy.”

David A. Fahrenthold covers Congress for the Washington Post. He has been at the Post since 2000, and previously covered (in order) the D.C. police, New England, and the environment.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.