The Washington Post

GOP’s latest proposal for Planned Parenthood funding

Planned Parenthood, the group at the center of the federal budget stalemate, has long been a target of conservatives who have been eager for an opportunity to cut off the taxpayer money it gets to provide health services to low-income women.

At issue is the $80 million that Planned Parenthood receives annually from the federal government through Title X, a program that provides grants to women’s health centers. By law, the money distributed under Title X may not used for abortions.

Planned Parenthood, a 90-year-old organization, is not only the nation’s largest abortion provider but has been a key proponent of abortion rights. It has 84 affiliates in all 50 states, as well as programs abroad. Its political action committee contributes money to abortion-rights candidates; most of those candidates, predictably, are Democrats.

The money it receives from the government goes toward the family planning services it provides at its more than 800 health centers, including contraceptives, breast and cervical cancer screenings and sexually transmitted infection tests. But conservatives have been critical of that funding, arguing that it frees up money for Planned Parenthood to devote to abortions.

Republican calls for defunding the organization grew louder this year after an antiabortion activist released undercover video purporting to show improper counseling by Planned Parenthood staff. But the group’s backers say the videos were misleading, and Democrats have strongly backed the group, saying it provides critical health care for women.

The debate took center stage this week when Democrats announced they had made significant concessions on the 2011 federal budget in hopes of avoiding a government shutdown Friday night, but said that Republicans were holding things up over Planned Parenthood funding.

Republicans, however, say Democrats are causing the holdup by not accepting deeper budget cuts.

In their talks at the White House Thursday night, Republican negotiators indicated they would be willing to abandon the proposal to defund Planned Parenthood, according to senior congressional aides. But Democratic negotiators rejected their alternative, which would have givenTitle X money to the states to dole out to the health groups of their choice. Currently, Title X funding goes directly to health organizations in the form of federal grants.

Sources said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and President Obama objected to the plan because they believed it would allow Republican governors to deprive not only Planned Parenthood but other women’s health groups of their public money.

“It’s their attempt to say they’re not directly going after Planned Parenthood, but we’ve rejected it because it has the same outcome,” said a senior Democratic aide familiar with the negotiations.

Republicans say the gesture represented a good faith effort to come to an agreement over the 2011 spending plan and that Democrats are misrepresenting the debate.

“All of the Democrats’ sound and fury this morning is empty. It’s based on, at best, an unlikely theoretical scenario,” said a senior Republican aide familiar with the talks. “They are grasping at straws to distract from the fact that they just won’t get serious about cutting spending.”

by Philip Rucker and Sandhya Somashekhar

In their talks at the White House Thursday night, Republican negotiators indicated they would be willing to abandon a controversial proposal to defund Planned Parenthood that is at the heart of the budget impasse, according to senior congressional aides. But Democratic negotiators rejected the proposal, which would have shifted the money to the states, because they said it would be just as damaging to women’s health.

Currently, Title X funding is provided in the form of federal grants directly to women’s health organizations, including Planned Parenthood. Under the Republicans’ alternative proposal, federal funds would be sent to states in the form of block grants, and it would be up to state governments to distribute those funds to health groups.

Sources said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and President Obama objected to this proposal because they believed it would allow Republican governors to deprive not only Planned Parenthood but other women’s health groups public money.

“It’s their attempt to say they’re not directly going after Planned Parenthood, but we’ve rejected it because it has the same outcome,” said a senior Democratic aide familiar with the negotiations.

Republicans say the gesture represented a good faith effort to come to an agreement over the 2011 spending plan and that Democrats are misrepresenting the debate that has centered on the nation’s largest abortion provider.

“All of the Democrats’ sound and fury this morning is empty. It’s based on, at best, an unlikely theoretical scenario,” said a senior Republican aide familiar with the talks. “They are grasping at straws to distract from the fact that they just won’t get serious about cutting spending.”

Planned Parenthood has long been a target of conservatives who say the government has no business funneling millions of taxpayer dollars to clinics that perform abortions.

The nonprofit receives about $80 million a year through Title X, which provided services for about five million people last year. Planned Parenthood served one-third of those people, according to the group, which has 84 affiliates and more than 800 health centers across the country.

Signed into law by President Nixon in 1970, the Title X program provides grants to clinics that offer reproductive health services for low-income people, such as cancer screenings, testing for sexually transmitted disease, education on HIV prevention and pregnancy counseling. By law, the money provided through the program may not used for abortions.

However, conservatives say it frees up money for Planned Parenthood to provide abortion services. Their calls for defunding the organization grew louder this year after an anti-abortion activist released undercover video purporting to show abuses by Planned Parenthood staff.

The debate took center stage this week when Democrats announced that they had made significant concessions on the 2011 federal budget in hopes of avoiding a government shutdown Friday night, but said Republicans were holding up the process over Planned Parenthood funding.

Republicans, however, say the impasse is also because Democrats will not accept deeper budget cuts. And they say Democrats’ intransigence is hurting U.S. troops by holding up the spending plan.

ruckerp@washpost.com

somashekhars@washpost.com

Philip Rucker is a national political correspondent for The Washington Post, where he has reported since 2005.
Sandhya Somashekhar is the social change reporter for the Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
Quoted
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.