The Washington Post

Federal-worker flag salute won’t fly

Columnist

A seemingly innocuous piece of bipartisan legislation that would provide an inexpensive flag-draped patriotic gesture is drawing right-wing opposition because the honor would go to federal civilian employees.

The legislation would authorize the presentation of American flags at the funerals of federal workers killed in the line of duty, much like is done for members of the military. It was expected to pass easily when it was scheduled for a vote in the House last week.

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns. View Archive

“Every year federal civilian employees are killed at home and abroad doing their duty for our nation,” said Rep. Richard L. Hanna (R-N.Y.), a sponsor of the bill. “The American flag embodies the values of our nation that these individuals worked to uphold. This legislation would provide a modest, but significant, benefit in honor of these dedicated individuals who sacrificed on our behalf.”

Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (Md.), the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he was glad Congress considered the bill “pertaining to our dedicated federal workforce, especially since they have received so much negative attention and criticism recently for simply doing their jobs.”

But as my colleague Eric Yoder reported, the bill stalled at the last minute, after Hanna could not attend the House session and, significantly, the American Legion denounced the bill.

Now the right-wing blogosphere has gone beyond the potentially fixable problems the Legion has with the legislation, with calls for conservatives to fight it.

While bill supporters are rallying against the Legion’s actions, the influence of the right -wing bloggers represents another hurdle. It was erected primarily by a redstate.com article by Erick Erickson. Its headline: “The Flags for Bureaucrats Act.”

Providing the flag to civilians, he wrote, means “it becomes just another trapping of power from the federal government available to all those people in the ever expanding federal bureaucracy.”

Erickson’s article has bounced around the Internet, along with his instruction: “Conservatives should oppose it.”

The Legion opposed the bill for several reasons, one of which is misleading.

“Civil service workers do not sign a pledge to defend America with their lives,” said Fang Wong, the Legion’s national commander, in a news release.

The truth is that the oath civilians and members of the military swear says they will “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

That’s included in a point-by-point reply to the Legion penned by Terry Newell, who was an originator of the flag idea. Newell, by the way, is an Air Force veteran and spent 32 years as a civilian federal worker.

Here are some other points made by the Legion and Newell’s responses, which were sent to supporters and a few congressional offices.

Legion: “The bill is a misguided attempt to equate civil service with military service.”

Newell: Not so. The civilians would get only a flag. Burial in a national cemetery would not be authorized, as is the case for members of the military. Neither are honor guards or 21-gun salutes for civilians. The bill “authorizes the presentation of a United States flag at the funeral of federal civilian employees who are killed while performing official duties or because of their status as a federal employee.”

Simply dying on duty isn’t enough. An employee has to be killed.

Legion: “This bill leaves far too much to be determined by a few individuals.”

Newell: “It does allow some discretion in saying that regulations must ‘consider the conditions and circumstances surrounding the death of an employee and the nature of the service of the employee,’ but this language was added specifically to give the head of the agency discretion NOT to provide a flag in instances where it is not warranted.”

Legion: “It doesn’t clearly identify associated costs.”

Newell: “Since a flag costs about $60 retail, and mailing or delivering it cannot cost much more . . . it is hard to imagine a caisson, 21-gun salute or honor guard, all suggested as possible by the American Legion statement, as being ‘incident’ expenses.. . . There is nothing in the bill or its history that even suggests such honors.”

The Congressional Budget Office says the legislation “would have no significant impact on the federal budget.”

A statement from Hanna’s office said he “takes the Legion’s concerns very seriously, and discussions are ongoing as to when and how the bill may be brought back up for a vote.”

If the right-wing bloggers don’t derail it first.

Read more on PostPolitics.com and the Fed Page

Discuss: Should civil servants receive a flag if they are killed on the job?

Secret Service gears up for 2012

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
Quoted
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
67% 22%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

column

feddiary

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.