The Washington Post

Congressional offices confront an increasing amount of mail

The U.S. Postal Service might be struggling financially because of a drop in mail volume, but Congress has the opposite problem. More people than ever before are writing to their lawmakers, and House and Senate offices are working overtime to keep up.

Some constituents still like to communicate the old-fashioned way — by mailing letters — but the growth of e-mail and the proliferation of Web sites enabling people to contact Congress have created a deluge of messages requiring a response, according to a report released Tuesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Management Foundation.

The improved technology and heightened interest in reaching out to Capitol Hill have run headlong into the bipartisan appetite for austerity. For nearly every congressional office, there is more work to do but not necessarily more people to handle the load.

“The question for any business or organization or culture that is experiencing that [trend] is, how do you manage it?” said Brad Fitch, the foundation’s president and chief executive.

In its report, “Communicating With Congress: How Citizen Advocacy Is Changing Mail Operations on Capitol Hill,” the foundation found that the volume of communication from constituents to congressional offices has skyrocketed in the past decade, with increases ranging from 200 to 1,000 percent over that time. The group notes that 2009 was a particularly fertile year for such communication — with high-profile stimulus and health-care bills generating plenty of reaction, for and against.

Notably, the foundation reports that the “bulk” of such messages are generated via advocacy campaigns by outside groups, and that 5,000 to 10,000 associations, nonprofit organizations and corporations have sections of their Web sites devoted to this purpose.

And the group highlights two key data points: “1) Some congressional offices have experienced a 1,000 percent increase in communications volume in the past decade; and 2) Congress has not increased staff size in personal offices since 1979.”

Since that year, the personal offices of House members have been allowed to hire only 18 full-time and four part-time workers, even though the volume of mail to offices and the size of districts have increased. After the 1980 Census, each congressional district averaged about 510,000 constituents. Once the current round of redistricting based on the 2010 Census is complete, the average district population will be more than 700,000.

And Congress is in the midst of cutting its own budget, as the House and Senate submit themselves to the same belt-tightening as the rest of the federal government. Some offices may choose to lay off staff in the coming year.

The messages Hill offices receive cover the spectrum: Some request help for a problem with Social Security or veterans benefits. Some advise a lawmaker to vote for or against a bill. And some writers — like commenters on political Web sites and callers to C-SPAN — merely want to vent on the topic of the day.

The good news is that as constituents use new technology to write to Congress more often, Hill offices are using the same technology to respond. Until recently, the foundation says, most lawmakers used traditional mail to respond, even to e-mailed queries.

Now, the group reports, 86 percent of congressional offices “answer all or most of their incoming constituent email with email, compared to only 37 percent in 2005.”

The bad news is that such responses can be a long time coming. The foundation found that “a sizable number of offices are unable to respond to constituent emails with pre-existing responses in less than a week.” And when an office does not have a pre-written response, it can take three weeks or longer to send out a reply.

Surveying congressional staffers, the foundation found that 58 percent of respondents said they spend more time handling constituent communications now than they did two years ago. Forty-six percent of aides said their offices have “shifted resources from other priorities” to deal with traditional mail and e-mail.

Beyond the volume of work, some aides told the foundation that their offices simply handled mail inefficiently — a simpler process would let them churn through more messages faster.

Despite the torrent, most staffers said they did not feel discouraged — 48 percent in the House said their offices had “sufficient resources” to handle communications, while 68 percent in the Senate said the same.

Not surprisingly, the offices that felt most comfortable using new tools also felt best able to handle constituent messages. The foundation found that a majority of “early adopters” of technology (the group released a separate report in July on congressional use of Facebook and Twitter) said their offices had the resources to handle mail, while “late adopters of technology on Capitol Hill felt much more overwhelmed.”

“The gulf between the most sophisticated offices and the least sophisticated offices is getting wider,” Fitch said.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.