The Washington Post

Congressional showdown looms over disaster relief spending

Quick passage of a measure to fund the government past the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30 could be derailed by a new fight between the House and Senate over disaster relief spending.

If not resolved, the clash could result in a government shutdown— exactly the kind of brinksmanship that both parties have pledged to work harder to avoid.

Having failed to come to agreement on a series of measures to fund government for the 2012 fiscal year, both chambers must now pass a stopgap measure before the month ends that would keep agencies running through Nov. 18.

That continuing resolution, which faces a House vote Wednesday, is designed to give the parties time to keep negotiating over spending for the remainder of the year.

Both sides are optimistic that the critical short-term bill will be approved because the big issue that had been dividing them — how much to spend in total — was already agreed to in the August compromise over raising the nation’s debt ceiling, in which Congress agreed to spend $1.043 trillion for the year.

At issue now are funds for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, where the relief fund that reimburses local governments and individuals for repairing disaster damage has almost run dry as a result of months of devastating storms, tornadoes and fires. As of Tuesday, the fund had dipped to $256 million.

Republicans in the House have included $774 million for the fund in their continuing resolution, money that would be made available immediately upon passage of the bill, as well as $226 million for flood relief efforts by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Their measure would also authorize $2.65 billion for the disaster relief fund for fiscal 2012.

They say the bill will ensure that dollars reach affected communities, and that they are willing to revisit the 2012 figure in future talks if more is needed.

“The House is going to act,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) told reporters Tuesday. “We’re going to deliver the money to the victims of the disasters.”

But Senate Democrats say the House is not spending nearly enough. The White House recently said the disaster relief fund needs $500 million immediately and will need $4.6 billion next year.

They also reject House GOP efforts to offset $1.5 billion of the funding with a cut to a program that offers loans to car companies to encourage the production of energy-efficient vehicles.

Ten Senate Republicans joined Democrats last week to approve their own $6.9 billion disaster relief measure that would fully fund Obama’s request, as well as $1.8 billion in additional disaster cleanup funds.

Emboldened by that legislative victory, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said Tuesday that he will try to amend the House’s measure with the Senate’s $6.9 billion figure when it arrives later this week.

House leaders say a bill with the higher FEMA funding cannot pass their conservative chamber.

House leaders will probably need some Democratic votes Wednesday to overcome opposition from conservative Republicans who would like to see the measure cut more in spending. House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said Tuesday that Democrats “will be loathe to support the measure” because of the offsetting cut to an auto program many believe creates jobs.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) downplayed the possibility of a shutdown.

“Congress always responds appropriately to disasters,” he told reporters. “We’re having a discussion about the appropriate way to do that, and I’m confident it’ll be resolved.”

But Reid said he was “not as certain.”

“We’re not going to cave in on this, because it’s a matter of principle,” he said.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
What happened in New Hampshire
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.