The Washington Post

Appeals court strikes down same-sex marriage bans in Indiana, Wisconsin

A unanimous panel of federal judges in Chicago ruled Thursday that laws banning same-sex marriage in Indiana and Wisconsin are unconstitutional, becoming the third appeals court to rule that gay couples must be allowed to marry.

The lengthy, often sarcastic ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit said the states could not justify denying marriage to homosexuals, who it said are “among the most stigmatized, misunderstood and discriminated-against minorities in the history of the world.”

“The grounds advanced by Indiana and Wisconsin for their discriminatory policies are not only conjectural; they are totally implausible,” wrote Circuit Judge Richard Posner, an influential jurist chosen for the bench by President Ronald Reagan.

He was joined in the opinion by judges Ann Claire Williams, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton, and David Hamilton, chosen by President Obama.

Two other regional appeals courts — the level of review just below the Supreme Court — have ruled that state bans are unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver struck down bans in Utah and Oklahoma, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond overturned the ban in Virginia.

Same-sex marriage status in the U.S., state-by-state

The winners and losers in all of those cases have asked the Supreme Court for a definitive ruling on whether the fundamental right to marry must be extended to same-sex couples or whether states may define marriage as only between a man and a woman.

The Supreme Court could consider whether to accept the question as early as this month.

The 7th Circuit’s decision was not unexpected. During oral arguments, Posner had been a relentless interrogator of the states’ lawyers, asking whether the laws were motivated by “hate” and “savage” discrimination.

But the speed of the 40-page ruling was surprising. It came only nine days after oral arguments.

The panel said the laws deprived same-sex couples of the equal protection guaranteed by the Constitution. Such discriminatory laws, the judges said, required government to present a compelling case as to why they are necessary.

“The only rationale that the states put forth with any conviction — that same-sex couples and their children don’t need marriage because same-sex couples can’t produce children, intended or unintended — is so full of holes that it cannot be taken seriously,” Posner wrote.

He ridiculed the notion that because only heterosexual couples can biologically produce children, it made sense for the states to limit marriage to straight couples.

“Heterosexuals get drunk and pregnant, producing unwanted children; their reward is to be allowed to marry,” Posner wrote. “Homosexual couples do not produce unwanted children; their reward is to be denied the right to marry. Go figure.”

In both states, Posner noted, homosexuals are allowed to adopt children, and in Indiana, unmarried gay couples are allowed to jointly adopt.

He added: “The state should want homosexual couples who adopt children — as, to repeat, they are permitted to do — to be married, if it is serious in arguing that the only governmental interest in marriage derives from the problem of accidental births. (We doubt that it is serious.)”

The panel also made short work of the states’ argument that it was constrained from ruling on the merits of the case. Their argument was based on the fact that the Supreme Court once chose not to hear a case about same-sex marriage because it said there was lack of a “federal question.”

The case, Posner wrote, “was decided in 1972 — 42 years ago and the dark ages so far as litigation over discrimination against homosexuals is concerned.”

The ruling does not immediately go into effect. The Supreme Court has stepped in to forbid marriages in the other states while the appeals proceed.

The decision came a day after a federal judge in Louisiana upheld that state’s ban on same-sex marriage. It was the first such decision by a district judge, whereas more than 20 challenges have gone the other way.

They are the result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in U.S. v. Windsor, which struck down the part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that defined marriage as only between a man and a woman. But that ruling did not settle the question of whether states may impose such definitions.

Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race
Most Read
Failed to render /WEB-INF/jsp/features/most/sidebar/feature.jsp. Cause: An exception occurred processing JSP page /WEB-INF/jsp/features/most/sidebar/feature.jsp at line 116 113: ${globemail} 114: 115: 116: <%=list.get(0) %> 117: 118: 119: <%=list.get(1) %> Stacktrace:. See Server Logs for detail.



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.