The Washington Post

Crossroads GPS probably broke election law, FEC lawyers concluded

The legal staff of the Federal Election Commission concluded in a just-released document that Crossroads GPS, a nonprofit organization backing conservative causes, probably violated campaign finance rules with its political spending in the 2010 midterm elections.

The law department’s 2012 conclusion, first reported by the Sunlight Foundation on Tuesday, shows the FEC staff’s reasoning in recommending an in-depth investigation of Crossroads GPS, which was founded by Karl Rove and others in 2010.

The recommendation, released quietly by the FEC on Friday afternoon, will have no effect on the organization because the FEC did not act on it. The commission deadlocked 3 to 3 when considering the proposal in December.

The six-member panel of commissioners is split ideologically, a divide that has stymied its ability to take action on many major campaign-finance issues in recent years.

Crossroads and its allies said the FEC’s deadlocked vote effectively dismissed a meritless, politically motivated case and affirmed that the group was abiding by the law.

But some outside observers say the findings in the legal staff report — based on an analysis of 2010 spending — are unusual.

“It is significant that the staff concluded that there was sufficient evidence to either investigate or settle the matter,” said Lawrence Noble, a former general counsel to the FEC who is now a lawyer advocating for campaign-finance reform in the private sector.

Crossroads GPS and an affiliated super PAC were among the biggest forces in the 2012 election cycle. Crossroads GPS pulled in $208 million, according to tax filings. Its sister organization, the super PAC American Crossroads, raised $117 million.

Crossroads GPS spent $74.2 million to direct political activity, according to a statement by spokesman Jonathan Collegio in November. Using that figure, the tax-exempt group devoted 38.8 percent of its spending to campaign-related activity.

But the FEC counsel’s office calculated that the group’s political spending in 2010 went beyond that, accounting for more than 50 percent of the total raised. That is significant because federal rules require that if an organization’s “primary purpose” is electing federal candidates, it must register with the FEC as a political action committee, not a nonprofit social welfare organization. Becoming a political committee requires that the organization report the identity of its donors, which is not required of social welfare organizations.

If Crossroads was required to file as a political committee, it would have to reveal its donor list, which includes some of the biggest givers on the right. One single donation received by the group in 2012 was for $22.5 million.

Many Republicans, including Crossroads GPS lawyer Tom Josefiak, a former general counsel to the Republican National Committee who served as FEC chairman in the 1980s, hailed the commission’s tie vote last month as a sign the case had no merit.

“I am not surprised that the Commission lacked the votes to find that Crossroads GPS is a political committee, because the law, court decisions, and Commission precedent are clear,” he said in a prepared statement. “Frankly, if the case had dealt with any other organization, and not GPS, the Commission would have unanimously dismissed the complaint a long time ago. Still, I’m pleased that the Commission decided that GPS is not a political committee, and now we can move on from this politically motivated complaint.”

Jan Baran, an election lawyer at Wiley Rein law firm, said that “FEC deadlocks and overruled staff recommendations are not new.” However, Trevor Potter, a reform advocate who represented the past campaigns of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and television satirist Stephen Colbert, said the FEC staff statement was unusually strong.

“The Office of General Counsel made some very strong arguments here,” Potter said in an e-mail. “The Commission’s inability to proceed to investigate whether the donors . . . should have been required to be disclosed, as the Supreme Court assumed in Citizens United they would, is another example of the FEC’s failure.”

Tom Hamburger covers the intersection of money and politics for The Washington Post.
Matea Gold is a national political reporter for The Washington Post, covering money and influence.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
We'll have half a million voters in South Carolina. I can shake a lot of hands, but I can't shake that many.
Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to a group of reporters about his strategy to regain support after a poor performance in the last debate
Fact Checker
Sanders’s claim that Clinton objected to meeting with ‘our enemies’
Sanders said that Clinton was critical of Obama in 2008 for suggesting meeting with Iran. In fact, Clinton and Obama differed over whether to set preconditions, not about meeting with enemies. Once in office, Obama followed the course suggested by Clinton, abandoning an earlier position as unrealistic.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.