The Washington Post

Debate on year-end fiscal issues sets stage for fall showdowns

Five and half months before the deadline for potential disaster, Congress broke into heated debate this week over a January fiscal meltdown that could lead to nearly $600 billion worth of tax hikes and automatic federal spending cuts next year.

The skirmishes included hours of floor speeches in the Senate and a House vote on related legislation Wednesday. Most unusual was the relatively long lead time of the debate, since this Congress has shown repeatedly its eagerness to avoid serious debate except as a last resort, when a deadline and calamity are close at hand.

Not even the most hopeful players expect the tax-and-spending issue to be resolved until after the November elections. But this week’s tit-for-tat served to set the terms of the debate for the fall elections in both the presidential and congressional campaigns.

Democrats accused the GOP of risking economic calamity to the middle class to protect lower taxes for the rich. Republicans accused Democrats of wanting to raise taxes and being soft on national security.

“Republicans’ top priority is to protect tax breaks for that top 2 percent, even if fighting for this causes a tax hike on middle-class families,” Sen. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), the No. 3 Democratic leader, told reporters Thursday.

“The president’s small-
business tax hike will hit nearly the same time as our military’s being hit with arbitrary cuts that will endanger our security,” House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said 20 minutes earlier. “Now some of those same Democrats are threatening to drive us off the fiscal cliff and tank our economy, all in their quest for higher taxes.”

Each side is trying to tell voters that it is helplessly riding shotgun as the other party is behind the wheel, steering the country toward disaster.

The situation is driven by the failure last fall of a specially empowered congressional “supercommittee” that had been tasked with finding $1.2 trillion in budget savings as part of a broader deal cut last August. With the supercommittee’s failure, the law requires the first wave of 10 years’ worth of automatic spending cuts to kick in Jan. 1 — at the same time that the income tax cuts approved during the George W. Bush administration, along with a host of other tax benefits, are set to expire.

The combined effect of those tax hikes and spending cuts would send the already limping economy back into a recession, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

At both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, the gridlock on how to structure a massive debt deal meant that the issue would be dealt with in a lame-duck session after the two sides delivered their pitches to voters in the November elections, a feeling epitomized by President Obama’s declaration last summer to GOP leaders that he would “take it to the people.”

In the absence of any serious negotiations of the fiscal issues ahead, the legislative agenda on Capitol Hill had become particularly light, which created the opening for each side to begin firing at the other on the tax-and-spending issues. Democrats said that in preparing for what they believed would be several weeks of Republican attacks accusing them of wanting to raise taxes and decimate the military budget, they decided to fire the first shots.

Obama began last week by restating his support for extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts only for the first $250,000 in income, offering such an extension for an additional year to buy time for a broader effort to reform the entire tax code next year.

On Monday, Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), who is overseeing the Senate Democrats’ campaign effort, declared in a speech that Democrats were willing to let the tax-and-spending deadlines pass in order to force a ”balanced deal” that included higher taxes from the top 2 percent of income earners.

Polling has consistently shown that a majority of voters believe the wealthy should contribute a larger percentage of taxes, and the traditional large GOP edge on the handling of taxes has turned into a draw between the parties. In the most recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, voters favored Obama, 46 percent to 45 percent, over GOP candidate Mitt Romney on who would best handle taxes.

“The politics of taxes has changed, and for 30 years Republicans won the argument because they conflated middle-income taxes and wealthy taxes,” Schumer said Thursday. ”And when middle-class incomes were going up, the middle class sort of shrugged their shoulders and said okay. With middle income going down, and with us being a lot smarter about this, we are separating the middle class from the wealthy and for the first time in 30 years winning the tax argument.”

“At a moment when more Americans are signing up for disability than finding jobs, Democrats said they think it’s a good idea to drive the country off what economists are calling America’s fiscal cliff this coming January,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Thursday morning. “You might call it ‘Thelma and Louise’ economics — right off the cliff.”

Paul Kane covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.