The Washington Post

Debt drama boils down to tale of two men

Nobody returned the president’s call.

On Thursday afternoon, President Obama and House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) had discussed a sweeping agreement that would have averted default on the national debt. On Thursday evening, Obama called back to talk more.

The president left a message, and waited.

Thursday evening turned to Friday morning. Morning turned to afternoon. Until then, President Obama said, he had believed a major agreement was close.

“Up until sometime early today,” he told reporters in a hastily called late-day news conference, “when I couldn’t get a phone call returned.”

By then, everything was in pieces. Boehner had called back and said he was backing out of the talks, blaming Obama for seeking increases in tax revenue. Obama had gone on television to blame Boehner, saying he had been “left at the altar” for the second time in a month.

The grand bargain was, apparently, dead — again.

Those 24 hours were the most dramatic in a weeks-long showdown, one that started as an effort to get the nation’s fiscal house in order but has also become a test of whether a government divided between hostile parties can function.

By Friday evening, as aides to each man recounted their versions of the same long day, a hopeful moment seemed to have vanished. The two sides seemed more divided and distrustful than ever. The only thing that had moved forward was the clock, ticking down to an Aug. 2 deadline.

“Sometimes it’s good to back away from the tree and take a look at the forest,” Boehner said at day’s end. “And yesterday afternoon, after the president demanded more revenue in this package, I came back . . . away from the tree to take a look at the forest.”

Friday’s events underlined how much this massive drama boils down to a story of two men. Twice in the past month, Boehner and Obama have been drawn together by the prospect of a sweeping deal — and then pulled apart by that deal’s potential price.

Aides said Friday was the culmination of talks between Boehner and the White House that began July 15, six days after Boehner pulled out of earlier discussions in a dispute over taxes.

By this week, aides said, Obama and Boehner were deep in the weeds of a potential agreement. In all, its provisions might have shaved about $4 trillion off the national debt over 10 years, which is $14.3 trillion and growing.

The deal, as envisioned by the two sides, would work in two steps. A relatively simple bill, short enough to hammer out in the next week, would have raised the debt ceiling and cut spending in the near term.

Then, Congress would have to work out broader changes to the tax code and huge entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security.

Among the ideas that seemed to be agreed upon:

$1.2 trillion in cuts to “discretionary” spending, which includes the budgets of federal agencies.

$250 billion in savings from Medicare. These might have been achieved by altering premiums for some programs, reducing payments to hospitals, and raising the eligibility age from 65 to 67 over time.

Raising $800 billion in new tax revenue, achieved by closing some loopholes, while overhauling the tax code to make personal tax rates lower overall.

Extending unemployment compensation for the long-term unemployed, as well as a one-year payroll tax holiday Obama won last year to help prop up the economic recovery.

But serious disputes remained. Boehner’s aides said the White House had upped its demands on taxes. From $800 billion, it wanted to add $400 billion in revenue, staffers said.

And, GOP staffers said, there was a dispute over a “trigger” inserted into the law. This was a provision intended to make sure the two sides kept their promises to return, after raising the debt ceiling, and reform the tax code and entitlement spending.

Boehner’s aides wanted something that would be painful for Democrats, to be sure they followed through. They suggested a trigger that would repeal two cherished elements of the health-care law: the individual mandate to purchase health insurance and a special board tasked with monitoring Medicare spending.

Obama’s staff said he wouldn’t agree to put those two provisions in the trigger. And Obama said he wouldn’t accept such large cuts to Medicare if Boehner wouldn’t accept that additional $400 billion in tax revenue.

On Thursday afternoon, these problems seemed serious, but not fatal.

Then Obama called Boehner back, and didn’t get him.

At the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, Boehner had begun to pull back to see the forest.

“I spent most of the morning and afternoon consulting with my fellow leaders, members of our conference and others about the way to go forward,” Boehner said. After those discussions, he decided that the White House had demanded too much: the increase in tax revenue, particularly, was an insurmountable problem.

Obama called again, in early afternoon, and was told that Boehner would call at 5:30 p.m. As that time got closer, Boehner was chatting calmly with reporters in the Capitol, joking with one guy about his tan, and puffing on a cigarette.

Asked by reporters whether he was having a bad day, Boehner said: “Have you ever seen me have a bad day?”

Then he thought of one. It was the day in 2008 when a vote to approve the Troubled Assets Relief Program failed in the House. The stock market dropped 800 points. “TARP was a bad day,” Boehner said. It could be a worrisome memory now, with world markets predicted to rumble if Aug. 2 arrives with no deal.

Staff writers Paul Kane and Rosalind S. Helderman contributed to this report.

Zachary A. Goldfarb is policy editor at The Washington Post.
David A. Fahrenthold covers Congress for the Washington Post. He has been at the Post since 2000, and previously covered (in order) the D.C. police, New England, and the environment.
Lori Montgomery covers U.S. economic policy and the federal budget, focusing on efforts to tame the national debt.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Republicans debated Saturday night. The New Hampshire primary is Feb. 9. Get caught up on the race.
Highlights from Saturday's GOP debate
Except for an eminent domain attack from Bush, Trump largely avoided strikes from other candidates.

Christie went after Rubio for never having been a chief executive and for relying on talking points.

Carson tried to answer a question on Obamacare by lamenting that he hadn't been asked an earlier question about North Korea.
The GOP debate in 3 minutes
Listen
Play Video
Quoted
We have all donors in the audience. And the reason they're booing me? I don't want their money!
Donald Trump, after the debate crowd at St. Anselm's College booed him for telling Jeb Bush to be "quiet."
Listen
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She's planning to head Sunday to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 38%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.