The Washington Post

Industry trade groups investing big in positive political messages

Rep. Fred Upton speaks as challenger Mike O'Brien listens during a debate on Oct. 8. (Matt Gade/AP)

In an election dominated by negative advertising, one group of big spenders is determined to stay positive. Industry trade associations, from dentists to credit unions, are pumping money into races and spending it overwhelmingly on feel-good messages.

When Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) faced a primary challenger this spring, he had the American Chemistry Council, the Realtors, radiologists and optometrists behind him. They sponsored television ads, direct mail and Web sites telling Upton’s constituents what a great job he’s done.

Officials at trade associations, which tend to be more bipartisan than other interest groups, say they’re glad to be doing things differently.

“We feel that there’s a need for some positive discussion in Washington about some of the leadership that’s been shown there,” said Anne Kolton, a spokeswoman for the chemistry council. “There’s value in highlighting good work on important issues.”

In Upton’s case, supplying the margin of victory may not have been the objective as much as winning favor with the 12-term incumbent. Upton is chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has oversight over vast swaths of the economy.

MAD MONEY | Presidential ad spending doubles in swing states

In fact, he didn’t need much support: His campaign outspent his challenger’s by 20 to 1 and he received twice as many votes in the primary. The roughly $200,000 spent by the trade groups was less than one-tenth of Upton’s campaign spending.

Political spending by industry associations has shot up — $8 million was spent through September, with all of it going for positive ads, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission. That is double the figure in each of the previous two campaigns and 10 times the 2006 spending.

The trade associations are spending more following a landmark 2010 Supreme Court decision and other rulings easing restrictions on corporate political spending.

The behemoth U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which serves as an umbrella group for business interests, also has spent heavily on the election, but mainly on attacks against Democratic lawmakers. And most of the spending by interest groups and super PACS that have formed to support candidates from both parties has been on negative ads.

There was not a hint of negativity when the American Chemistry Council, which represents large chemical manufacturers, ran an ad supporting Upton in the primary.

“From the shores of Lake Michigan to our factories and family farms, hard work is a way of life,” a narrator says. “And in Washington, Congressman Fred Upton is working hard for us to cut red tape and government regulation.”

The group, which has pledged to spend several million dollars on ads for its favored lawmakers, praised in a news release Upton’s support of “a comprehensive energy policy, pro-growth tax policies and rational science-based regulation.”

Jamie Gregory, chief deputy lobbyist for the National Association of Realtors, said his group doesn’t spend on a race if the help is not needed. “We get involved in races to make a difference, not to just wave a flag and make somebody feel good,” Gregory said.

The Realtors have spent the most in two California races, devoting $1 million to help Rep. Brad Sherman (D) and $1.6 million for Rep. Gary G. Miller (R). Both have supported the Realtors’ legislative priorities, Gregory said.

The group is focused on preserving preserving the mortgage interest deduction and the pending reform of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

But more of the Realtors’ money goes to state and local races, where decisions on zoning and environmental concerns affect development.

Federal law bars corporations, unions and other interest groups from donating directly to candidates, but they have traditionally sponsored political action committees to funnel employee donations in amounts limited to $5,000. That still accounts for most of the corporate-linked money flowing to federal races.

In 2010, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission struck down limits on corporate or interest group spending to support candidates, as long as the groups don’t coordinate with the candidates.

“We couldn’t do this without Citizens United,” said Peter Kezirian, an executive with the Cooperative of American Physicians, which provides insurance for California doctors and advocates for tort reform.

The cooperative, which functions in some ways like a professional association, has been involved in state and local races for years under California law. This election cycle it is including federal races through a super PAC with $2.6 million from the cooperative’s general treasury.

The group runs positive ads because the doctors who run it are “men and women of science,” Kezirian said, adding that the spots help lawmakers by boosting their favorability with voters. “It allows them to withstand the negative hits that are going to come,” Kezirian said.

Professional groups often reserve the biggest sums to benefit members of the trade. Ophthalmologists have spent $153,000 — two thirds of their ad spending — to benefit Rep. Nan A. S. Hayworth (R-N.Y.). Dentists are strongly pushing Reps. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho) and Paul A. Gosar (R-Ariz.), both fellow dentists.

“They can be champions not just of our bills, but champions of dentistry within Congress,” said William Calnon, president of the American Dental Association and a practicing dentist in Rochester, N.Y.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.