The Washington Post

Congress members and union rally in support of federal workers


The American Federation of Government Employees marched on the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, determined to take the offensive in an ongoing skirmish with the forces inside.

Perhaps a couple of hundred AFGE members, staff and supporters walked the few blocks from the Hyatt Regency hotel, where the union’s annual legislative conference is taking place, to the West Front of the Capitol. They wanted to let Congress know it should “share prosperity, not austerity,” as the crowd chanted.

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns. View Archive

“We’ve got to get Congress to understand that federal employees have given enough,” Everett Kelley, AFGE vice president for the Southeast region, said over rally noise. “AFGE and federal employees have given over $120 billion [through compensation hits] over a 10-year period of time.”

Some in Congress already appreciate that message, as evidenced by the number who participated in AFGE events. Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) and five members of the House, all Democrats, braved the cold to speak at the rally, including Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), the Democratic leader. On Monday, four representatives, including one Republican, addressed several hundred union members in the warmth of a hotel ballroom.

At the AFGE’s general session Monday morning, AFGE President J. David Cox Sr. fired up union members tired of feeling like the federal workforce is taken for granted.

Members of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) march on the U.S. Capitol Tuesday. (Photo by Bill Burke/American Federation of Government Employees)

“We ain’t taking crap from nobody no more,” he shouted. “Now is the time for us to go on the offensive.”

The AFGE and other federal employee organizations have been forced into playing defense for the past few years by trying to ward off attacks on their pay and benefits. But now that the three-year freeze on basic federal pay rates is over, labor organizations are acting like a chronic fever has been broken.

On Wednesday, for another example, the National Treasury Employees Union will unveil a public relations campaign — including radio and television announcements, a Web site, and social media — to emphasize the role feds play in the daily lives of taxpayers.

Promising a campaign to overturn increased pension contributions for new employees, Cox said, “We will not let this be a race to the bottom. . . . Not no, but hell no.”

He’s aware that it’s going to take more than fiery speeches to get Congress to reverse legislation that created a three-tier federal retirement system. Employees hired this year pay more toward their annuities than those hired last year. And those employees pay more than those hired before that.

“I do understand the political landscape,” he told reporters after his speech Monday. “I’m a realist.”

Cox pointed to AFGE’s “Big Enough to Win” strategic plan, “a first for our union” that was released at the conference. In a December memo to union officials, Cox said the plan is meant “to reposition AFGE from a defensive to a proactive posture.”

The plan includes the appointment of legislative and political coordinators by each local. At least 127 have been appointed in the past month, according to a draft document.

At the national level, the plan calls for supporting volunteers with training on subjects such as outreach to community partners, an image campaign with more news releases, Facebook advertising and a mass-media drive “to change the way the public views federal employees and their union.”

The plan is “designed to create the power necessary to overcome the attacks and win a better future for our members and their families,” Cox wrote in a memo to conference attendees.

Justine Kelly of Dayton, Ohio, echoed that at the rally when she said “to treat us [federal workers] like we are lazy or undeserving is really unfair.” She works for the Social Security Administration and is married to a Defense Department employee.

The attacks might not be over.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told Monday’s crowd “my guess is that the [next] House Republican budget will once again have a big hit to federal employees in it.”

One speaker was unusual because he often votes against AFGE positions. Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) voted in support of AFGE positions 32 percent of the time in 2013. But he was instrumental, according to Beth Moten, AFGE’s legislative and political director, in securing the 1 percent raise for federal blue-collar workers that was earlier provided to their white-collar colleagues.

Also, but unsaid, his invitation was a strategic move to cultivate friends among the House Republican majority that can determine the fate of federal employee programs.

Giving a mini-budget lesson during Monday’s session, Cole said the government allots $164 billion less on discretionary spending than it did during the last fiscal year of President George W. Bush’s administration.

“A lot of that sacrifice has come directly from federal employees,” he said. “That is one heck of a contribution to the fiscal problems of this country.”

Feds aren’t used to hearing Republicans give them that much credit.

After the applause died down, Cole added, “and I would say that’s probably about as far as we can go.”

The liberal union activists cheered the conservative Republican.

Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP

Previous columns by Joe Davidson are available at

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
What happened in New Hampshire
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.