The Washington Post

Federal employees angry at shutdown turmoil


In the shutdown shootout between the House and the Senate, Republicans and Democrats, it is federal employees who get shot.

Even the threat of a partial government shutdown, with the unending back-and-forth on Capitol Hill, left them battered and bruised.

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns. View Archive

And they are plenty mad about it.

Sharyn Phillips, an Internal Revenue Service lawyer in Manhattan, said all of the turmoil has left her “very angry.”

“I am saddened to know that I have not gotten a raise for the last three years, had my award canceled, been furloughed for three days during fiscal year 2013, have endured continued threats on my benefits, all the while watching the Congress cause unbearable gridlock for no legitimate legislative purpose,” she said.

“Its inaction is not serving me, my colleagues or our country well, and I am ashamed that the greatest country in the world has devolved to this.”

In Chicago, workers took to the streets for a lunchtime demonstration against a shutdown. They gathered at Federal Plaza with signs that read “Jobs Not Furloughs.”

“Federal employees are hopping mad and sick and tired of this going on,” said John J. O’Grady, president of the American Federation of Government Employees local at Chicago’s Environmental Protection Agency offices. “The morale is just so low, it’s just unbelievable. I don’t know why any young people would want to work for the federal government now.”

Morale wasn’t helped by a statement from Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), reported in the Huffington Post. “It’s a temporary inconvenience for a lot of people,” he said. “But if Obamacare is ever implemented, we will never recover from that as a nation. We can never be a free people again.”

A bit of hyperbole, maybe?

Katy Scheflen, a Justice Department employee in the District, took strong exception to King’s comment.

“ A ‘temporary inconvenience’ is when there is a delay on the Metro, or when an elevator is out of service,” she said. “Many of the federal workers, such as myself, who will be furloughed live paycheck to paycheck. . . . Not having that paycheck is not a temporary inconvenience.” She said she found the characterization “disgusting and insulting.”

“Federal workers are not just some abstract concept, but they are actual, real, flesh-and-blood people — who are currently wondering how we are going to pay the mortgage, pay utilities, pay for gas, and put food on the table,” her e-mail continued. “It’s not a game to us. GET IT? We are PEOPLE, not bargaining chips.”

Directing her comments to King, who did not reply to a request for comment, Scheflen added: “Shame on you for not even having the decency to acknowledge that taking away our ability to do our jobs and support ourselves is devastating. Or is that just an inconvenient truth?”

President Obama gets it. Speaking on Monday afternoon, he pointed to the injury federal workers faced.

“In the event of a government shutdown, hundreds of thousands of these dedicated public servants who stay on the job will do so without pay,” he said. “And several hundred thousand more will be immediately and indefinitely furloughed without pay. What, of course, will not be furloughed are the bills that they have to pay: their mortgages, their tuition payments, their car notes. These Americans are our neighbors. Their kids go to our schools. They worship where we do. They serve their country with pride. They are the customers of every business in this country. And they would be hurt greatly, and as a consequence all of us will be hurt greatly, should Congress choose to shut the people’s government down.”

Mark Horowitz, a music specialist at the Library of Congress, is angry and worried. He’s worried about his colleagues who can’t afford to miss a payday “and all the non-federal employees whose businesses depend on their patronage. I worry for the present and the future.”

That worry speaks to something more fundamental than a missed paycheck, as important as that is. It gets to a deep concern about a government that cannot govern, at least not well. It speaks to a lack of confidence in the institutions of government, Congress in particular, where routine budget processes can repeatedly be held hostage by lawmakers seeking to demolish the health-care law of the land.

No one looks good to the public in this dispute. But even as many Americans find fault with the Affordable Care Act, 63 percent of those surveyed disapprove of the way Republicans are handling negotiations over the budget, according to a Washington Post-ABC news poll. Democrats and Obama fare better, although not good, at 56 percent and 50 percent, respectively.

Given the past few days, it’s a wonder more don’t disapprove.

Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP

Previous columns by Joe Davidson are available at

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
We'll have half a million voters in South Carolina. I can shake a lot of hands, but I can't shake that many.
Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to a group of reporters about his strategy to regain support after a poor performance in the last debate
Fact Checker
Sanders’s claim that Clinton objected to meeting with ‘our enemies’
Sanders said that Clinton was critical of Obama in 2008 for suggesting meeting with Iran. In fact, Clinton and Obama differed over whether to set preconditions, not about meeting with enemies. Once in office, Obama followed the course suggested by Clinton, abandoning an earlier position as unrealistic.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.