The Washington Post

Five senators to watch on immigration bill

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, made the rounds Sunday morning, appearing on nearly every talk show. He discussed immigration, impending gun-control legislation, and his criticism of Beyonce and Jay-Z’s trip to Cuba. (Nicki DeMarco/The Washington Post)
Reporter

After years of false starts, the Senate appears ready to introduce a bipartisan immigration bill this week — a piece of legislation that has massive policy and political implications attached to it.

A bill being introduced isn’t the same thing as a deal that passes the Senate, of course. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” crafting the legislation, acknowledged as much in an interview Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House. View Archive

“It is not the take-it-or-leave-it offer,” he said. “It is a starting point of reform.”

Below is our look at five senators who will have a major role to play in whether the bill will make it to the finish line and what it will look like if/when it does. (Senators are listed in alphabetical order.)

John Cornyn : What the Texas Republican does will be fascinating for three reasons. First, he is up for reelection in 2014 and has to be mindful of how his now-colleague Ted Cruz upset the establishment pick in a Republican Senate primary in 2012. Second, the issue of immigration is obviously a pressing one in the Lone Star State — with strong voices both for and against reform. Third, Cornyn is the second-ranking Republican in the Senate and could well be a window into how the party’s leadership views the legislation and the political and policy issues surrounding it.

Bob Menendez : The New Jersey Democrat will be a barometer of whether the bill is aggressive enough for liberals in the Senate to support it. Menendez, who like Rubio is Cuban American and a member of the Gang of Eight, sounded an optimistic note in an interview Sunday with Star-Ledger editorial columnist Linda Ocasio. “This bill might not have been the one I would have written,” he said. “But it is the art of the possible.” If Menendez stays on board, he’ll bring along other liberals who have concerns about the money being spent on border security. If he walks, so will they.

Rand Paul : If the first three months of the 2013 Congress have proved anything, it’s that the Kentucky Republican with one eye squarely on the 2016 presidential race has a real ability to influence issues and debate in Washington. (See drones.) In a speech to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce last month, Paul seemed open to a comprehensive overhaul although pointedly did not use the phrase “path to citizenship,” which is sine qua non for Democrats when it comes to the broader bill. (Paul is apparently for a path to normalization, not a path to citizenship.) If he signs on to whatever the final bill looks like, Paul will provide significant cover for conservative Senators wary about voting in favor of something that a significant chunk of their GOP constituents oppose.

Mark Pryor : The Arkansas Democrat is up for reelection in a very red state — President Obama lost it by 23 points in 2012 — and will be very mindful of concerns that this bill rewards those who entered the country illegally. (If you haven’t bought stock in the word “amnesty,” now would be a good time to do so, because you are going to hear it a lot over these next weeks and months.)

Rubio: Yes, the senator from Florida gets lots and lots of attention on the immigration bill. (He was on seven — yes, seven! — talk shows on Sunday.) But, in this case, the attention is warranted. Rubio not only is Cuban American but also represents a state where immigration is a top-of-the-mind issue. And then there is the fact that he is widely regarded as the front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. It’s no exaggeration to say that if Rubio walks away from the final product on immigration, the bill might not make it.

Discuss this topic and other political issues in the politics discussion forums.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Quoted
We'll have half a million voters in South Carolina. I can shake a lot of hands, but I can't shake that many.
Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to a group of reporters about his strategy to regain support after a poor performance in the last debate
Fact Checker
Sanders’s claim that Clinton objected to meeting with ‘our enemies’
Sanders said that Clinton was critical of Obama in 2008 for suggesting meeting with Iran. In fact, Clinton and Obama differed over whether to set preconditions, not about meeting with enemies. Once in office, Obama followed the course suggested by Clinton, abandoning an earlier position as unrealistic.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.