The Washington Post

Food stamp cuts will hurt families still trying to recover from recession, advocates say

Volunteers pack bags of rice at the San Francisco Food Bank on Nov. 1, 2013, in San Francisco, Calif. An estimated 47 million Americans will see their food stamp benefits cut as temporary relief to the federal program ends with no new budget from Congress to replace it. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

About 47 million Americans who rely on food stamps for their meals will have to get by on less after their benefits were cut Friday.

“The impoverished are forced to eat junk if we want to eat,” said 32-year-old Tabitha, a mother of a 2-year-old and a 7-year-old staying at a Culver City, Calif., shelter, who asked that her last name not be used to save her embarrassment. “It’s going to be difficult, as it already has been. I don’t understand why there’s all this government funding, all these programs, and why feeding down-and-out people is not as important as it should be.”

The cut was triggered by the expiration of the stimulus spending Congress approved in the depths of the Great Recession. But it is unlikely to be the last; in Washington, the House and the Senate are trying to reconcile bills approved in each chamber that would reduce food stamp spending by billions more dollars.

Friday’s benefit reduction was meant to be timed to a brightening economy, yet many Americans remain stuck in poverty.

“I think it’s a horrible thing,” said Najuah Mudahy, 30, another resident of the Culver City shelter. She is a food stamp recipient who works two jobs, as a clerk at a shoe store and a hostess at a California Pizza Kitchen. They bring in $9 an hour. Mudahy said that before the end of every month, she runs out of money to feed her 3-year-old daughter, even on dinners of canned soup.

Food advocates say there are millions of other people in similar predicaments, and they implored Congress to stop targeting the program for budget trims.

Even before Friday, government statistics show, food stamps fell short of keeping recipients well nourished. In California, the monthly allocation for a family of four with no income has dropped to $632. The benefit varies around the country, based on the cost of living.

About 14 percent of Americans are on food stamps. The program has grown rapidly in recent years, attracting the attention of deficit hawks, who note that it now costs taxpayers $75 billion a year.

The legislation passed by the Republican-led House could lead to nearly 2 million Americans losing access to the program, according to congressional analysts. It would cut $40 billion over the next 10 years.

The cut approved by the Democrat-controlled Senate would reduce the program by $4 billion over the next decade.

Obama administration officials said the reductions that took effect Friday are certain to result in missed meals for those enrolled. For 7 million Americans, food stamps are their only source of income, according to Kevin Concannon, undersecretary for food, nutrition and consumer services at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The cut “is a huge challenge for those households,” he said. Local food banks, Concannon said, are not positioned to serve as backstops.

“It would be like asking someone running a marathon with a 100-pound pack on their back to take on another couple hundred pounds,” he said. “They don’t have the capacity to do this.”

Advocates across the country said they are alarmed.

In Texas, about 4 million people receive food stamps each month, a dramatic increase from 2.5 million five years ago. The latest cuts will drain $411 million from the state’s economy, said Celia Cole, chief executive of the Austin-based Texas Food Bank Network.

“That’s a big hit for the state,” she said.

While many Texans have bounced back from the recession, she said, “the number of people living in poverty has not changed — things haven’t gotten better for them yet.”

— McClatchy-Tribune

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate on Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Philip Rucker and Robert Costa say...
For Trump, the victory here was sweet vindication, showing that his atypical campaign could prevail largely on the power of celebrity and saturation media coverage. But there was also potential for concern in Tuesday's outcome. Trump faces doubts about his discipline as a candidate and whether he can build his support beyond the levels he has shown in the polls.
The Post's John Wagner and Anne Gearan say...
Hillary Clinton, who was declared the winner of the Iowa caucuses last week by the narrowest of margins, now finds herself struggling to right her once-formidable campaign against a self-described democratic socialist whom she has accused of selling pipe dreams to his supporters.
People have every right to be angry. But they're also hungry for solutions.
Hillary Clinton, in her New Hampshire primary night speech
I am going to be the greatest jobs president that God ever created.
Donald Trump, in his New Hampshire primary victory speech
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
See results from N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.