The Washington Post

House, Senate intelligence chairmen voice fresh concerns about NSA eavesdropping

Intelligence Committee Chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) talks with Bob Schieffer on “Face the Nation” Nov. 3, 2013, in Washington, D.C. (CBS News/Via Getty Images)

The leaders of the Senate and the House intelligence committees voiced fresh concerns Sunday about recently revealed
National Security Agency surveillance efforts and what the White House says it knew about them.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) suggested that he didn’t believe recent reports indicating that President Obama was unaware that the United States had been monitoring German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone for more than a decade.

“I think there’s going to be some best-actor awards coming out of the White House this year and best-supporting-actor awards coming out of the European Union,” Rogers said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Rogers said it was “a bit shocking” that people around the world who are actively engaged in espionage apparently “didn’t have an understanding about how we collect information to protect the United States.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein ­(D-Calif.), Rogers’s counterpart in the Senate, said on the same program that tapping the phone lines of close foreign allies “has much more political liability than probably intelligence viability.”

But Michael Hayden, a former NSA director , said “leadership intentions were a very-high intelligence priority for the life of the National Security Agency. It’s nothing special, and it’s certainly nothing new.”

Hayden, also appearing on “Face the Nation,” said he takes Obama’s statement that he was unaware of the activity “at face value,” adding that the fact that others apparently didn’t rush to tell the president supports the notion that the high-level eavesdropping “wasn’t exceptional. This is what we were to do.”

Feinstein renewed her call for a “full review” of U.S. intelligence programs, saying that the White House is conducting one and that she hopes Congress will as well.

Rogers complained that there has been too much focus on the NSA revelations and too little on the threats the United States faces.

“We need to focus on who the bad guys are,” Rogers said. “And the bad guys, candidly, are not U.S. intelligence agencies. They’re the good guys at the end of the day.”

Both intelligence committee chairmen rejected the recent suggestion that Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor who leaked agency documents, might receive clemency in the United States. Snowden, now living in Russia, has been charged with theft and two violations of the 1917 Espionage Act.

“He stripped our system,” Feinstein said, adding that Snowden could have chosen to become a whistleblower and share the documents he uncovered with Congress. “That didn’t happen,” she said. “Now he’s done this enormous disservice to our country.”

Rogers echoed that view, saying that Snowden had committed a crime “that actually put soldiers’ lives at risk in places like Afghanistan.”

Dan Pfeiffer, a top White House adviser, said there had been no White House discussions of clemency for Snowden.

“Our belief has always been that he should return to the U.S. and face justice,” Pfeiffer said on ABC’s “This Week.”

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.