The Washington Post

In filibuster vote, ‘Old Bull’ Democrats in Senate take back seat to young bucks

The “nuclear option” means the Senate is about to become a more partisan battleground. (The Washington Post)

This past week’s big fight to change the Senate’s filibuster rules essentially boiled down to a battle between two Democrats — Sens. Carl Levin of Michigan and Jeff Merkley of Oregon.

Levin, 79, is a popular 35-year veteran who has been the senior Democrat on the prestigious Armed Services Committee since 1997. Merkley, 57, has been in office less than five years, holds no committee gavels and has yet to usher a major piece of legislation into law.

But on Thursday, Merkley effectively rolled Levin. On a mostly party-line 52 to 48 vote, Democrats eliminated the 60-vote hurdle to clear a filibuster on most presidential nominations.

Merkley became the most prominent anti-filibuster voice, leading a collection of newcomers against the “Old Bulls” of the Democratic caucus who guard their senatorial privilege like a birthright. No bull fought harder against the young bucks than Levin.

There’s no sign of any personal animosity between the duo, and Merkley’s personal online biography boasts of his work with Levin to place limitations on risky financial trades by big banks. But Merkley and Levin have deeply divergent views on the true intentions of the Senate’s founders.

For the first-term senator, the Republican blockade of President Obama’s nominees turned history on its head. The privilege of advising and consenting on a president’s nominees, Merkley said, had turned into “block and destroy.”

“The vote that comes today is the necessary outcome of a series of broken promises,” Merkley, who has never served in the minority, told reporters Thursday. “And it restores, what we did today restores the traditional understanding of advice and consent.”

Levin, who wants to ease confirmation rules, rejected the party-line methods that critics have labeled the “nuclear option.” It was the first time a major rules change or precedent had been adopted without clearing a two-thirds majority, the standard since 1917 as a guarantee that rules would be altered only in bipartisan fashion.

“What this is all about is ends and means. Pursuing the nuclear option in this manner removes an important check on majority overreach,” Levin said in a floor speech after the vote, paraphrasing the 1949 remarks of the legendary Sen. Arthur Vandenberg. “. . . If a Senate majority decides to pursue its aims unrestrained by the rules, we will have sacrificed a professed, vital principle for the sake of momentary convenience.”

Levin, who has served almost half his tenure in the minority, fears the logical next step will be to do away with filibusters of Supreme Court nominations and on legislation. Indeed, some Democrats are already girding for that fight.

“I think that we should get rid of the filibuster for legislation as well as nominations,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), in his first year in the chamber. “So for a lot of us this is only halfway to the finish line.”

Merkley’s victory demonstrated just how much the Senate has changed in the past five years.

The initial push to rein in filibusters began in late 2009, in the wake of the failed “public option” effort to create a government-sponsored health plan to compete with private insurers as part of what became the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Even though there were 60 members of the Democratic caucus at the time, a handful of centrist Democrats opposed the public option, leaving it short of the filibuster hurdle.

The idea died, but liberal activists latched onto the filibuster as their new bete noire. Merkley and Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) took up the cause, pushing for a party-line vote that would change filibuster rules on everything from legislation to nominations.

Back then, however, the Democratic caucus was dominated by Old Bulls. Levin had allies such as Robert C. Byrd (W.Va.), who used his last public appearance to support filibuster rules. These views were shared by many committee chairmen, such as Sens. Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.), Kent Conrad (N.D.), Max Baucus (Mont.), Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.) and Patrick J. Leahy (Vt.)

Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) also rejected changing rules with a simple majority. “It takes 67 votes,” he said in February 2010.

Byrd died in June 2010, and later that year Dodd and Conrad retired. They joined a mass exodus of senatorial experience and stature over the past five years through death, defeat and retirement.

Now, roughly 60 percent of the 55-member Democratic caucus has served only in the majority. Take Connecticut’s Senate turnover. Dodd and Joseph I. Lieberman (I), who left the Senate at the end of 2012, served a combined 54 years and both opposed the nuclear option.

Their replacements, Murphy and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D), were strong advocates for it.

With pressure mounting, Levin worked on multiple occasions with his longtime friend Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to slightly modify confirmation rules over the past three years.

Junior Republicans, however, stepped up their tactics on Obama’s appointments, including attempted filibusters of Chuck Hagel’s confirmation as defense secretary and John Brennan’s as CIA director.

Merkley refocused the rules change just on nominations, and by the spring he had won a large number of converts in the younger, more partisan Democratic caucus.

Finally, Reid came aboard by July as Republicans were blocking nominees to lower-level agencies. McCain and Reid reached a last-minute deal that cleared those selections — but only put off the inevitable.

Once Republicans filibustered three Obama selections for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit over the past month, Reid was again ready to detonate the rules change. The precedent would lower the threshold to 51 votes for all nominations except those for the Supreme Court, leaving the 60-vote filibuster intact for legislation.

He rounded up the final votes the past few weeks from Feinstein, Boxer and Leahy.

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) denounced the effort as a “power grab.” Aside from Reid, McConnell singled out one other Democrat in his long, angry speech: Merkley.

When the roll call came, Levin was one of three Democrats to side with McConnell. The other two — Sens. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) and Mark Pryor (Ark.) — come from deeply conservative states.

Levin was the only traditional liberal to oppose it, the single Old Bull in opposition.

Merkley took a victory lap in an impromptu news conference.

“Never was the Senate intended to be a deep freeze,” Merkley said. “And yet, that is what it has become under this abuse of the filibuster.”

Asked if there was any way to turn back the clock on filibusters, he demurred.

“The Senate has spoken,” Merkley said.

Paul Kane covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Republicans debated Saturday night. The New Hampshire primary is on Feb. 9. Get caught up on the race.
Highlights from Saturday's GOP debate
Except for an eminent domain attack from Bush, Trump largely avoided strikes from other candidates.

Christie went after Rubio for never having been a chief executive and for relying on talking points.

Carson tried to answer a question on Obamacare by lamenting that he hadn't been asked an earlier question about North Korea.
We have all donors in the audience. And the reason they're booing me? I don't want their money!
Donald Trump, after the debate crowd at St. Anselm's College booed him for telling Jeb Bush to be "quiet."
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She's planning to head Sunday to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
56% 36%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.