TOPEKA, Kan. — Kansas has paid more than $913,000 to two private law firms that are helping the state defend antiabortion laws enacted since conservative Republican Gov. Sam Brownback took office, and such expenses appear likely to grow.
The attorney general’s office disclosed the figures in response to requests from the Associated Press. More than $126,000 in legal fees stem from two lawsuits filed this summer against restrictions enacted just this year.
Kansas has enacted broad limits on abortion and providers since Brownback took office in January 2011. The state has not attempted — as Arkansas and North Dakota have — to ban abortions in the earliest weeks of pregnancies.
The newest Kansas restrictions, challenged in separate state and federal lawsuits this summer, block tax breaks for abortion providers and even govern what appears on their Web sites.
A state-court lawsuit is still pending against health and safety regulations approved in 2011 specifically for abortion clinics, but the state prevailed in a federal lawsuit against 2011 restrictions on private health insurance coverage for elective abortions. All of those cases have been handled by Thompson Ramsdell & Qualseth, a firm in Lawrence, Kan.
A federal lawsuit against a 2011 law preventing the state from distributing federal family-planning dollars to Planned Parenthood to provide non-abortion services is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver. That case has been handled by Foulston Siefkin, the state’s largest law firm, with offices in Wichita, Topeka and Overland Park.
Peter Brownlie, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-
Missouri, said Monday that the spending shows the Republican-dominated legislature is more interested in “political posturing” on abortion than good financial stewardship.
His organization provides abortions at a clinic in the Kansas City suburb of Overland Park and is involved in two federal lawsuits.
“It’s a travesty that Kansans are spending $913,000 on things that don’t benefit the state in any way,” Brownlie said.
But abortion opponents contend abortion providers are to blame for the expenses because they’ve turned to the courts after losing support for their positions among voters.
“It’s a free country, and there’s a right to sue on anything,” said Mary Kay Culp, executive director of Kansans for Life, the most influential antiabortion group at the statehouse. “But, then, to try to blame us for the money involved in defending the lawsuits is ridiculous.”
The state has paid the Foulston firm more than $386,000 for its work on the lawsuit over the family-planning funds for Planned Parenthood.
The Thompson firm has been paid more than $527,000, including more than $252,000 for defending the 2011 clinic regulations. The state paid the firm almost $149,000 for work on the successful defense of the health insurance law.
Brownback, a strong abortion opponent, called on state lawmakers to create a “culture of life” upon taking office. The legislature already had strong antiabortion majorities, but its efforts to restrict abortion were stymied by previous governors who had supported abortion rights.
Some restrictions are not being enforced because of the lawsuits. But Culp and other abortion opponents have said the laws were written to survive court scrutiny — unlike in other states such as North Dakota, where lawmakers passed a law banning abortions as early as the sixth week of pregnancy.
A federal judge blocked the North Dakota law, and legislators there set aside $400,000 to defend antiabortion measures.