An intensifying debate over Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, a front-runner in President Trump’s search for a Supreme Court nominee, gripped Republicans on Tuesday, with conservative critics highlighting past rulings and his links to GOP leaders while his allies — including inside the White House — forcefully defended him.
The political moment for Trump was fragile as a president devoted to his base weighed what a Kavanaugh selection could mean for him, unfolding amid a flurry of op-eds and phone calls praising the 53-year-old judge as well as a clamor from those who see him as out of step on health care and abortion, or too tied to George W. Bush’s White House.
“You hear the rumbling because if you’ve been part of the establishment for a long time, you’re suspect,” veteran conservative organizer Richard Viguerie said in an interview. “Kavanaugh carries that baggage.”
“Movement conservatives fume at Trump SCOTUS favorite,” blared a headline Tuesday in the Daily Caller, a conservative website, atop an article featuring right-wing activists with sharp words for Kavanaugh.
Trump advisers said Tuesday that the president was aware of the squabbling and closely monitoring news coverage of his interviews, but they cautioned that he has not been swayed by a particular voice.
The president, however, has asked aides about Kavanaugh’s opinions on health care that have frustrated some conservatives, according to two people close to the president who were not authorized to speak publicly. They added that Trump has pored over news articles spotlighting Kavanaugh’s history with Bush — part of a powerful political family that has vocally opposed Trump — but did not see it as a fatal strike against him.
Trump has also spoken by phone with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) this week, according to three people briefed on the call who were not authorized to discuss it publicly. Paul and his advisers had conveyed their concerns about Kavanaugh to the White House in recent days, citing his decisions on health care. Since the Republican majority in the Senate is 51 to 49, losing just one GOP vote could jeopardize a nominee.
MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, a former Bush adviser, noted on her afternoon program Tuesday that former Bush officials were being careful to not be too effusive about Kavanaugh, or otherwise risk hurting their former colleague’s chances.
“This is the whisper campaign that’s out there trying to destroy Kavanaugh, and it could be legit,” syndicated radio-show host Rush Limbaugh told his listeners Monday. “The long knives are out from people from all sides of the aisle, folks.”
Kavanaugh, 53, has a long history in Washington, having helped investigate President Bill Clinton as part of independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr’s team and then serving as a close aide to Bush before joining the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2006.
The sudden scrutiny and objections have vexed Kavanaugh’s supporters, who days ago viewed him as one of the strongest prospects because of his past tenure as a Kennedy clerk and his deep support among veteran Republican lawyers — and have given a sudden jolt of hope to supporters of other contenders for the bench.
“A bunch of haters have come out against Judge Kavanaugh,” wrote David Lat, the founding editor of the legal website Above the Law. “The attacks lack merit, especially the ones from the right.”
The questions have come from some social conservatives, a group Trump has relied on for continued and fervent support after promising during the 2016 campaign to appoint justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide.
Jim Bopp, a prominent social conservative and lawyer, expressed wariness about Kavanaugh’s handling of certain cases in a letter to Trump, according to a report by the National Law Journal. When reached for comment Tuesday, Bopp said his letter was not meant to oppose any candidate but “simply to prompt a discussion about who’s the best person,” and he declined to talk about Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh’s critics have pointed to a recent case involving a pregnant immigrant teenager in federal custody as reason to doubt his conservatism on the abortion front.
He voted against the teenager, who was seeking immediate access to abortion services, and noted the government’s “permissible interest” in “favoring fetal life,” but he did not go as far as another D.C. Circuit judge, Karen Henderson, who said the undocumented teen had no constitutional right to an elective abortion.
Shannen W. Coffin, a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Bush administration, said: “It’s a bit baffling to me that conservatives would find reason for alarm in that case when he was a dissenting judge. . . . He’s bound by Supreme Court precedent.”
A 2016 case over the contraceptive mandate in President Barack Obama’s health-care law has also drawn attention. Kavanaugh sided with the group Priests for Life, but in his opinion he wrote that Supreme Court precedent “strongly suggests that the Government has a compelling interest in facilitating access to contraception” but that there were less “restrictive means of furthering” that interest.
Separately, in a 2011 challenge to Obama’s health-care law, Kavanaugh dissented from a D.C. Circuit decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, but he did so for technical and jurisdictional reasons instead of declaring the law unconstitutional, as ideological purists would have preferred.
The personal biography of Kavanaugh, a Yale Law School graduate who grew up in Bethesda, Md., has also been lauded and criticized, with some Republicans seeing a reliable conservative and others seeing a political insider.
White House counsel Donald McGahn, who is coordinating the candidate interviews for Trump, has been unpersuaded by Kavanaugh’s opponents and has spoken repeatedly and reassuringly about his credentials with top Republicans, according to three people briefed on those discussions.
But McGahn’s ability to stave off jabs at Kavanaugh could be tested in the coming days as the debate leapfrogs from Washington think tanks and law firms to the turbulent world of conservative media.
The White House communications team, which set up a political war room Monday to bolster the eventual nominee, has been mum about Kavanaugh because the president has yet to make a decision, leaving the debate to play out largely without White House involvement.
William Kristol, editor at large of the Weekly Standard, a conservative magazine, dismissed the back and forth as “what usually happens when you have an opening on the court. The small world of conservative lawyers, law clerks and potential judges come out with their judgments and their loyalties.”
Some Trump supporters are torn. “Kavanaugh is clearly the best choice. But Barrett would be the most fun,” conservative commentator Ann Coulter tweeted Tuesday, referring to federal appeals court Judge Amy Coney Barrett, another finalist for the high court, who clashed with Senate Democrats last year during her confirmation hearing when they asked questions about her Catholic faith.
Coney Barrett’s confirmation fight also propelled the Notre Dame Law School alumna and professor to a certain legal stardom among conservatives, and many Kavanaugh critics have cited her as their favorite because of that experience and what they described as an appealing profile for a court full of Ivy League graduates.
Along with Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett, Trump met Monday with federal appeals court judges Amul R. Thapar and Raymond Kethledge, according to three people briefed on the meetings who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a long-shot candidate for the court, also spoke with Trump by phone. “It was in a nominee capacity,” Lee spokesman Conn Carroll said of the president’s conversation with Lee, who is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will vet Trump’s nominee. Lee’s interview with Trump was first reported by the Deseret News.
White House spokesman Raj Shah also confirmed that Trump spoke on the phone with Lee, although Shah did not characterize it as an interview.
Two others on Trump’s shortlist are federal appeals court Judge Thomas M. Hardiman and Judge Joan L. Larsen, according to Trump advisers. The White House said the president spoke to three potential Supreme Court nominees Tuesday but did not disclose their names.
As Trump reviewed his shortlist, advocates for finalists were busy Tuesday talking to White House officials and other allies of the president, still believing that the process remains fluid and potentially upended, should Kavanaugh fall out of favor at some point this week.
Kethledge — another former Kennedy clerk whose meeting Monday with Trump went favorably, according to three people briefed on the session — saw “Lead Yourself First,” his co-written book on leadership, circulated around conservative legal circles.
“He’s somebody who could come from outside of Washington,” former Michigan senator Spencer Abraham (R) said in an interview. Abraham, a friend of Kethledge, said “the court could use some diversity in terms of background.” Kethledge is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School.
Others chose names from Trump’s longer list of potential nominees and urged consideration.
“Allison Eid,” a federal judge in Colorado, “is my favorite partly because I know her and she used to work for me,” former education secretary Bill Bennett said. “I’ve floated her on TV and elsewhere.”
The well-connected orbit of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) continued Monday to talk up Thapar. And Hardiman was boosted by a friend, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, who made phone calls on his behalf.
“He’s the most confirmable,” Santorum said in an interview, describing his pitch. “You look at his background” — Hardiman drove a taxi to help pay for law school — “and you see somebody who’s not just a white-shoe lawyer guy.”
Ann E. Marimow, Seung Min Kim and Michael Kranish contributed to this report.