The Washington Post

Local lawmakers don’t back formal action on Redskins name change

Several local lawmakers said Monday that they support a name change for the Washington Redskins football franchise, but none appeared inclined to support congressional action to do so.

“I think it would be wise and appropriate for Dan Snyder to consider changing the name,” Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said in a statement. “I hope there will continue to be conversations that lead to resolution on this issue.”

The long-fought battle over the Redskins name — which several national groups, including the Oneida Indian Nation, have deemed racist — resurfaced this week when Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) wrote a letter to National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell urging the league to formally support a name change for the franchise.

Redskins owner Daniel Snyder has previously said that, despite mounting pressure, he does not plan to change the name.

The letter re-sparked a conversation about what, if any, action Congress could take to force a name change, but several members whose districts include the sections of Maryland that comprise the heart of the Redskins fan base said that although they support a name change, they do not think Congress should take formal action on the matter.

Bridgett Frey, a spokeswoman for Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), said, “As a fan, Congressman Van Hollen believes the best approach to the overall question would be for the team to voluntarily change its name — as the Washington Bullets did — but does not believe that congressional action should be taken to force that change.”

Several other members of the Maryland delegation echoed that sentiment.

In a statement, a Redskins spokesman brushed aside the lawmakers’ letter to Goodell, saying, “Don’t they have more important issues to worry about than a football team’s name?” Meanwhile, in a statement released Monday, Ray Halbritter, an Oneida Indian Nation spokesman, said, “The NFL is a publicly subsidized $9 billion-a-year brand with global reach, and it is using those public resources and that brand to promote a dictionary defined racial slur.”

Wesley Lowery is a national reporter covering law enforcement and justice for the Washington Post. He previously covered Congress and national politics.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
New Hampshire primary: What to expect
New Hampshire will hold a traditional primary just eight days after the Iowa caucuses. Polling in the Granite state has historically been volatile in the final weeks before the primary. After the Iowa caucuses, many New Hampshire voters cement their opinions.
The Post's Ed O'Keefe says ...
Something has clicked for Bush in New Hampshire in the past few days. What has transpired by no means guarantees him a top-tier finish in Tuesday’s Republican primary here, but the crowds turning out to see him are bigger, his delivery on the stump is crisper and some of his key rivals have stumbled. At the least, the developments have mostly silenced talk of a hasty exit and skittish donors.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.